From: Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>
To: Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de>
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Wish: mutable variant types, equivalence with records
Date: Sat, 24 Mar 2012 19:32:48 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAJMfKEWjsCLOxv8qD9YE7DJjb7NUAO778DEXvM-ZkLA2r5nidg@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87fwcx6ejm.fsf@frosties.localnet>
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 7:26 PM, Goswin von Brederlow <goswin-v-b@web.de> wrote:
>
> So why not allow mutable in variant types and some equivalence with
> records? For example:
>
> type <name> = <Constructor> of [mutable] <type>[:label] [| ...]
>
> as in:
>
> type foo =
> | Bar of int:i * mutable int:bar_used
> | Baz of float:f * mutable int:baz_used
>
> let use x =
> match x with
> | Bar bar ->
> bar.bar_used <- bar.bar_used + 1
> | Baz baz ->
> baz.baz_used <- baz.baz_used + 1
>
> let print x =
> use x;
> match x with
> | Bar bar -> Printf.printf "%d\n" bar.i
> | Baz baz -> Printf.printf "%f\n" baz.f
>
> The label is optional and any types in the constructor without label
> would be translated into anonymous fields in a record that are
> ineaccessible.
>
> type foo = Foo of int * mutable int:used
>
> would be equivalent to { _ : int; mutable used : int; }
>
> Taking it one step wurther one could even allow:
>
> let bar = { i = 1; bar_used = 0; }
> let foo = Bar bar
> let foo = let Bar bar = foo in Bar { bar with i = 2; }
>
>
> What do you think?
I'm not sure about mutable but I'd appreciate labels :D
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-03-24 18:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-03-24 18:26 Goswin von Brederlow
2012-03-24 18:32 ` Lukasz Stafiniak [this message]
2012-03-24 18:39 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2012-03-24 18:42 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2012-03-25 22:45 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-03-24 18:42 ` Jonathan Protzenko
2012-03-24 18:45 ` Wojciech Meyer
2012-03-24 18:59 ` Lukasz Stafiniak
2012-03-29 22:46 ` François Bobot
2012-03-30 12:16 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-03-30 15:00 ` François Bobot
2012-03-31 15:52 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2012-03-31 19:17 ` Alain Frisch
2012-03-26 8:41 ` Romain Bardou
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAJMfKEWjsCLOxv8qD9YE7DJjb7NUAO778DEXvM-ZkLA2r5nidg@mail.gmail.com \
--to=lukstafi@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=goswin-v-b@web.de \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).