Sorry! I've spotted it reading the email. (I should read before sending.)


On Thu, Dec 19, 2013 at 11:17 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi,

This is just a test so I'm not much concerned, but I have these definitions:

type z
type _ s
type (_, _, _) balance =
  | Less : (*∀'a.*) ('a, 'a s, 'a s) balance
  | Same : (*∀'b.*) ('b, 'b, 'b) balance
  | More : (*∀'a.*) ('a s, 'a, 'a s) balance
type _ aVL =
  | Leaf : z aVL
(here)