After reading this thread, I'm starting to thinking about another option,
namely: "local un-open", because I certainly dislike ambiguity.

So, maybe, something like:

Vec.( ^(3 * v) * vx + vy)

where anything in ^(... ) is not subject local open.

Regards


În Mar, 4 aug. 2015 la 12:40, Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch> a
scris:

> Le mardi, 4 août 2015 à 10:26, Goswin von Brederlow a écrit :
> > > let ox = V2.((dot v ox) * ox) in
> > > V2.(3 * ox + oy)
> >
> > What is wrong with that code?
> >
> > I'm assuming V2 has:
> >
> > val (+): t -> t -> t
> > val (*): int -> t -> t
> > val dot: t -> t -> int
>
> It also has
>
> val ox : t
>
> Daniel
>
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs