I'd also like to see the standard gnu way.
Le dimanche, 14 avril 2013 à 16:20, William Smith a écrit :
> Would there be any interest in me making the change everywhere and submitting it as a patch?
Not at all...
> One concern I have is that it might break automated test scripts.
That may be the case but more importantly your fancy way of reporting error messages is not recognized by emacs' compilation-mode. ocaml's current way of reporting allows compilation-mode to perfectly hilight the span of the error in your source *without* having to tweak the `compilation-error-regexp-alist` variable. That's not the case of your format.
If something has to be changed I'd rather have the gnu standard way of reporting errors for ranges [1] which is both more compact and recognized by emacs' compilation-mode.
Best,
Daniel
[1] http://www.gnu.org/prep/standards/standards.html#Errors
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs