From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 943DF7FB13 for ; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 10:47:54 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of kennethadammiller@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kennethadammiller@gmail.com"; x-sender="kennethadammiller@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of kennethadammiller@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kennethadammiller@gmail.com"; x-sender="kennethadammiller@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ob0-f180.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.180; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="kennethadammiller@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f180.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At8BAGItgFTRVda0m2dsb2JhbABag1hYBIMBsz+OJoFqgXsBhBoCgRAHFgEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBgsLCRQuhAMBAQMBEhEdARsSDAMBCwYFBAcaHQICIgERAQUBChIGEwgKEIgGAQMJCQ2zPj0xizCBbIMHizIKGScDClmFBQEBAQEGAQEBAQEBFgEFDpBUC4JxgVEFhGEGhWyJU4Y0gVqQShIlgRCCCViBYiEwgkUBAQE X-IPAS-Result: At8BAGItgFTRVda0m2dsb2JhbABag1hYBIMBsz+OJoFqgXsBhBoCgRAHFgEBAQEBEQEBAQEBBgsLCRQuhAMBAQMBEhEdARsSDAMBCwYFBAcaHQICIgERAQUBChIGEwgKEIgGAQMJCQ2zPj0xizCBbIMHizIKGScDClmFBQEBAQEGAQEBAQEBFgEFDpBUC4JxgVEFhGEGhWyJU4Y0gVqQShIlgRCCCViBYiEwgkUBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.07,514,1413237600"; d="scan'208";a="91615673" Received: from mail-ob0-f180.google.com ([209.85.214.180]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Dec 2014 10:47:37 +0100 Received: by mail-ob0-f180.google.com with SMTP id wp4so2528116obc.11 for ; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:47:36 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=HXDsnIdsJqNae9o7UIFzM0mCaxnKdL5RIZ2G9bc9ZPE=; b=ndsVdpEqTaiKoF09iOzHkW6id+aHF/QcsbixT9rmwlGxtb2mn2lEfcTXx0QUT6G57L uiij24H/cOUaUvU55ejCQ/YK7Ph2pUs9DmyDBZfMc5p4cPN3rcSBlBm5LCF/BCOIFazQ BoZZycDjpEERzhOqNOucCF6geDBDYEsPBzXmSNDOy9p1xWoo2U4ig76jyp5fi/MoI8X6 i2JrLdqbP5xUVyVIS7c7qMC1yM/TAP4IG7deh90HUqyGO7SuN6F31S4ZrkS4W0OT5HYB xoDpvGjBLIadVIQZQoXxaOeypmhvoW0m0qNA9niRSfr/qEHdBI1vGyP9IDCzhqQbW3Ef EO9Q== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.60.58.33 with SMTP id n1mr6127819oeq.85.1417686456601; Thu, 04 Dec 2014 01:47:36 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.182.197.1 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Dec 2014 01:47:36 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <54802A60.7020704@inria.fr> References: <54802A60.7020704@inria.fr> Date: Thu, 4 Dec 2014 04:47:36 -0500 Message-ID: From: Kenneth Adam Miller To: caml users Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0158b696a61488050960d981 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] What are people using when writing distributed applications in OCaml? --089e0158b696a61488050960d981 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 I personally use ocaml-zmq bindings, and I am working with the piqi author (and my work) to try and release my ocaml RPC implementation. On Thu, Dec 4, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Francois Berenger < francois.berenger@inria.fr> wrote: > Hello, > > If you know about some distributed application that went into production > and that can happily withstand the fire of production and real world > loads, I would be happy to here about which library the system was using. > > I have heard about MPI and zmq for example, which both have > ocaml bindings. However, I also know that there are several RPC > implementations out there (one in ocamlnet, one in mirage, one in core), > but I am not sure about which one is the most mature and production-tested. > > Thanks a lot, > Francois. > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > --089e0158b696a61488050960d981 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I personally use ocaml-zmq bindings, and I am working with= the piqi author (and my work) to try and release my ocaml RPC implementati= on.

On Thu, = Dec 4, 2014 at 4:33 AM, Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inri= a.fr> wrote:
Hello,

If you know about some distributed application that went into production
and that can happily withstand the fire of production and real world loads,= I would be happy to here about which library the system was using.

I have heard about MPI and zmq for example, which both have
ocaml bindings. However, I also know that there are several RPC
implementations out there (one in ocamlnet, one in mirage, one in core), bu= t I am not sure about which one is the most mature and production-tested.
Thanks a lot,
Francois.

--
Caml-list mailing list.=C2=A0 Subscription management and archives:
ht= tps://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners<= /a>
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

--089e0158b696a61488050960d981--