Right, length-prefixing is another common trick. In fact, this is exactly what Writer.send does. Your code at the moment is a little weird because it uses Reader.recv, whose documentation says "[recv t] returns a string that was written with Writer.send", but you're not using Writer.send. I think if you use those pairs of things then you get the semantics you want. More generally, async has good support for reading chunks of data, which might contain partial messages, and then putting those chunks together to form full messages. See Unpack_sequence in async_extra, which works with Unpack_buffer in core_kernel. On 16 June 2015 at 18:50, Kenneth Adam Miller wrote: > Ok, I have one last question - I've gotten my unit tests to succeed > properly, but I'm concerned. > > At one point in the Pipe documentation, it talked about how writes a recvs > would guarantee progress by returning early if they had something at all. I > just need some kind of guarantee of the semantics of a send and recv, so > that if I send a string of length 4, I don't receive multiple fragments. > > On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:48 AM, Kenneth Adam Miller < > kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote: > >> Ah. Well I think I can incorporate from that what I can, but my unit >> tests need to be reflective of the use case I have. I'm sending protobuf >> encoded messages between two processes on one machine-whatever the size of >> the message, that's the size that should be received on the other end (I've >> read about the returning partial bytes, I can't decode a part of a proto >> message, it has to be the right size). >> >> I can't use write_line, I'll have to find a way to delimit the messages >> based on size. I think I'll just prepend every message with the size that >> it should expect, and then read a integer off the stream and then that many >> bytes. >> >> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:41 AM, David House >> wrote: >> >>> Ah, now I read your code in more detail I think I see why. >>> >>> Reader.contents on the server side will block until eof. The client side >>> sends some stuff, but does not close the writer, so the server never sees >>> eof. (Recall that sockets are not like files: it's possible to read all of >>> the available data right now, but not reach eof.) >>> >>> Network protocols normally have some explicit "this is the end of one >>> message" marker, like a newline or something similar. Then the server just >>> reads chunks until it sees that marker, at which point it can put the >>> message together and to something with it. >>> >>> For example, you could use Writer.write_line on the client side and >>> Reader.read_line on the server side. >>> >>> On 16 June 2015 at 16:36, Kenneth Adam Miller < >>> kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> So, now I can get server received if I add that into the callback, but >>>> at "writing shutdown to server" I don't see response received or even >>>> something for Eof. >>>> >>>> On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 11:09 AM, David House >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> The first thing to try is to make sure that everything is getting >>>>> flushed. For temporary debugging messages I strongly recommend just using >>>>> [Core.Std.eprintf "\n%!"]. >>>>> >>>>> On 16 June 2015 at 16:03, Kenneth Adam Miller < >>>>> kennethadammiller@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> I'm having trouble with OCaml Async. I wrote a small server with it, >>>>>> and right now I'm trying to unit test that server. Here's my code for the >>>>>> server: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> let _main ()= >>>>>> print_endline "Server running"; >>>>>> let handler = print_endline in >>>>>> let socket = Tcp.on_port 5554 in >>>>>> let server = Tcp.Server.create socket (fun addr r w -> >>>>>> (Reader.contents r) >>| handler; (Writer.write w "got it")) in >>>>>> server >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> In my unit test code I have: >>>>>> >>>>>> let test_shutdown test_ctxt = Thread_safe.block_on_async_exn (fun () >>>>>> -> ( >>>>>> print_endline "test_shutdown"; >>>>>> let server = Server._main () in >>>>>> server >>= fun server -> >>>>>> let where = Tcp.to_host_and_port "127.0.0.1" 5554 in >>>>>> Tcp.connect where >>= fun s -> >>>>>> let socket, r, w = s in >>>>>> ignore (Writer.write w "kill"); >>>>>> ignore (Writer.flushed w); >>>>>> (Reader.recv r >>> function >>>>>> | `Ok result -> print_endline ("writing shutdown to >>>>>> server" ^ result) >>>>>> | `Eof -> ()); >>>>>> return () >>>>>> )); () >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> I see test_shutdown and Server running, but not sign of "writing >>>>>> shutdown to server" or even "got it"; why isn't my server or even any of >>>>>> the connection executing? >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>> >> >