From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <mmatalka@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 45EED7EDD9
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun,  7 Oct 2012 02:22:21 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  mmatalka@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com";
  x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  mmatalka@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.182 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com";
  x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible;
  x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.214.182;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f182.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoIBAOrKcFDRVda2kGdsb2JhbABFrSCReggjAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCIAEBAQQMBgIsARsSCwEDDAYFCw0NISEBAREBBQEKEgYTEhCHUAEDDwubGQkDjCWCdYQBChknAwpZiHUBBQyKXWYnhWkDlBaBVYEVig6DLBYphA+BWg
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,545,1344204000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="176114515"
Received: from mail-ob0-f182.google.com ([209.85.214.182])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 07 Oct 2012 02:22:20 +0200
Received: by mail-ob0-f182.google.com with SMTP id wc20so4996303obb.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=02U2ooj0QTAmMvOM2pT+w8zGEty7EvNpoFJl+yYKrtI=;
        b=thDmMDOgJ/xg1lAQ8aZ15WeCri+c/zpcinVIHGq57vsB1zP+/GEgxT6c6yv7u6wBc3
         xNeC64wSSAfipBvDTJ9rGujiiJev5WuCi0+a9SHe2eHbCLLXhcSNqlg4TnuaPHGXitW/
         zwEJ0jX1EJI3e+AA2wMLVgNZbe8lAODGFySpBONSRfKIf7e8J10AcYtSHns0KxXMUKET
         wNPYtWHLh0dqn4UxRMR/XBYYNzi/tjBV8D+jw0Mdh2eLxAVU7BPLHwORwvcO+jOx7wbL
         9533P4nftQWsHlJGrQ1KqLAHszSoJh4LAXqmDPiDPer9GQHHQ5z4rM98bcyqNYZIdMGO
         lOSg==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.60.170.176 with SMTP id an16mr9980708oec.57.1349569339028;
 Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:22:19 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by 10.76.79.132 with HTTP; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:22:18 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CALru5wUSDjRpp5MCzsPb_J-LRfPPPgWHqzp2X9T5pHK-aqU2-A@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAKziXDWqNeCjgUBCz=29arq0bOcWRrxWns85hR5iMGA262oZTg@mail.gmail.com>
	<50709949.9020002@etorok.net>
	<CALru5wUSDjRpp5MCzsPb_J-LRfPPPgWHqzp2X9T5pHK-aqU2-A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 7 Oct 2012 02:22:18 +0200
Message-ID: <CAKziXDWaqWG47H2r-A573+q0ZFRBSUJJ2JaDk2Ht0+jxOY5Ecw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Malcolm Matalka <mmatalka@gmail.com>
To: Mike McClurg <mike.mcclurg@gmail.com>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?T=F6r=F6k_Edwin?= <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.net>, 
	caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam update failing

Bringing my opam up to date was the trick.  Works like a charm now.

On Sun, Oct 7, 2012 at 1:56 AM, Mike McClurg <mike.mcclurg@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Oct 6, 2012 at 9:49 PM, T=F6r=F6k Edwin <edwin+ml-ocaml@etorok.ne=
t> wrote:
>> On 10/06/2012 10:57 PM, Malcolm Matalka wrote:
>>> Hello!  I did an opam update and after printing a list of packages
>>> that need upgrading I get:
>>>
>>> ...
>>> - ulex.1.1
>>>  - variantslib.108.00.02
>>>  - zed.1.2
>>> File /home/mmatalka/.opam/opam/ANSITerminal.0.6.opam: Bad format!
>>
>> I had a similar 'Bad format' message a while ago, and it went away
>> after upgrading to opam 0.7.
>> For some reason the download instructions took me to version 0.6
>> at the time, even though 0.7 was already available.
>> The download instruction point to 0.7 now though, which version do you h=
ave?
>
> Opam changes very often. The latest tag on github is 0.7.5, which is
> working well for me. I recommend rebuilding opam regularly, but only
> from the tagged versions.
>
> Mike
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs