make -j<number > should work.
On Jul 26, 2013 3:10 AM, "Francois Berenger" <berenger@riken.jp> wrote:

> On 07/26/2013 06:45 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net>
>> wrote:
>>
>>>
>>>  I would like to gather thoughts on that in the ocaml.org website,
>>>> because actually its advice is 'make + OcamlMakefile' and 'Omake',
>>>> and I am not sure it is the best advice.
>>>>
>>>
>>> I suppose this advice used to be good, but today maybe not as much
>>> anymore.
>>>
>>
>> I have an old (and fairly small) project that I've tried at least
>> thrice to migrate off OcamlMakefile to something more
>> modern/ocaml-specific, and failed each time (after spending 1-2
>> evenings on it). I'll give it another go and report back on my
>> experience, but at least historically OCamlMakefile was the easiest
>> thing to get up and running.
>>
> >
>
>> You can see the pretty simple makefile here:
>> https://github.com/**martindemello/varix/blob/**master/makefile<https://github.com/martindemello/varix/blob/master/makefile>- I can't
>> remember exactly what difficulties I had with ocamlbuild and omake
>> now.
>>
>
> How is the parallelization of the build with OCamlMakefile?
>
> Is it good (i.e. faster than ocamlbuild)?
>
> F.
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/**arc/caml-list<https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list>
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**ocaml_beginners<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners>
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-**bugs<http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs>
>