From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DEFE081799 for ; Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:01:08 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mmatalka@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=74.125.82.53; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of mmatalka@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.53 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.53; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-wg0-f53.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=74.125.82.53; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mmatalka@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-wg0-f53.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Al4CAKMB8lFKfVI1k2dsb2JhbABagztQqzyJaIhCgQ4IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIkAQEEAUABGxILAQMBCwYFBAcNDSEiAREBBQEKEgYTCAqHawEDCQYMm06MT4J/hEEKGScDCmSHdAEFDI9tBAeEAAOXX4Epjj8WKYJcgWA6 X-IPAS-Result: Al4CAKMB8lFKfVI1k2dsb2JhbABagztQqzyJaIhCgQ4IFg4BAQEBBwsLCRQEJIIkAQEEAUABGxILAQMBCwYFBAcNDSEiAREBBQEKEgYTCAqHawEDCQYMm06MT4J/hEEKGScDCmSHdAEFDI9tBAeEAAOXX4Epjj8WKYJcgWA6 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.89,748,1367964000"; d="scan'208";a="27369429" Received: from mail-wg0-f53.google.com ([74.125.82.53]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 26 Jul 2013 07:01:08 +0200 Received: by mail-wg0-f53.google.com with SMTP id c11so2375489wgh.8 for ; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:01:08 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dN8XszU5cHjHMTd9zZHhuU8Fvteh1pixVBomB/9ETbQ=; b=K8Lo48Dn0zOw78xJsWHIabTwQYHK7zDfd/Tx3+xeTa5wlWV3zFvW/x/7xhInVomILI IdOtaGtSHUX7GieO/xIl4mYg9TLne3dXUIkbirimSnbIqRU1u8xrpFbHu0ZkX5Z8vj9g btRo0wEsZDi/DtGt0nym9YcAwfx/H9HPaCAzu5C6581DwwcTpWMlc/aaqrWHSuz0PwMW FWEpXMuYI4XwxyEjjW7YWaNTg105VmRCwQDA1G+WZifh54LIxEsp0oqHcx3vXI85mH3s /9MQAmGAkTheQMqbngt9mA4ESDoYHZVx5RiKqwYnCTLiGrKK5+2rKDuYgH6FjOoxr3M2 +fJw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=dN8XszU5cHjHMTd9zZHhuU8Fvteh1pixVBomB/9ETbQ=; b=lumVsNrVP/L5P9VDl40qHgGXC9b7wL/PBJgVXtHythwB1lnXOjG+l0X3ZtkrcDku6P Ob7wQHQH1fwlFJnVB0iq9S+KR+HFLB7FYXtDLuhiLEnP1e1YL3zd5+ktgTxATP+jC4UV CvUVVqGWCSVrAo61I+j4bEf4A9lVvD2hef/d5x2yU/pd6IxugxZDAQx7BosdxmyRHdrn pZ6NNEAgetK6XbAflhqLNfqq7PLxHbqAk1WNzt+ITbAATdDgDBw6Rpzp2fpxf3rjrDud 1rLXWycu7AxbSLuAfD05UXZa+Hj0eQF59GDgcJgTaGRrKqOPGMoZcm4pEK4l4x46G6Zx AdKA== MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.180.90.141 with SMTP id bw13mr544861wib.15.1374814867979; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.44.33 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:01:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.194.44.33 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Jul 2013 22:01:07 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <51F1CC76.60802@riken.jp> References: <51ECF4EB.1060301@libertysurf.fr> <1672419877.217810363.1374484053368.JavaMail.root@zimbra27-e5.priv.proxad.net> <20130723153956.605104b3@xivilization.net> <51F1CC76.60802@riken.jp> Date: Fri, 26 Jul 2013 07:01:07 +0200 Message-ID: From: Malcolm Matalka To: Francois Berenger Cc: caml-list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=f46d043be1a6d6843f04e2630765 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] which ocaml build system --f46d043be1a6d6843f04e2630765 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 make -j should work. On Jul 26, 2013 3:10 AM, "Francois Berenger" wrote: > On 07/26/2013 06:45 AM, Martin DeMello wrote: > >> On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Marek Kubica >> wrote: >> >>> >>> I would like to gather thoughts on that in the ocaml.org website, >>>> because actually its advice is 'make + OcamlMakefile' and 'Omake', >>>> and I am not sure it is the best advice. >>>> >>> >>> I suppose this advice used to be good, but today maybe not as much >>> anymore. >>> >> >> I have an old (and fairly small) project that I've tried at least >> thrice to migrate off OcamlMakefile to something more >> modern/ocaml-specific, and failed each time (after spending 1-2 >> evenings on it). I'll give it another go and report back on my >> experience, but at least historically OCamlMakefile was the easiest >> thing to get up and running. >> > > > >> You can see the pretty simple makefile here: >> https://github.com/**martindemello/varix/blob/**master/makefile- I can't >> remember exactly what difficulties I had with ocamlbuild and omake >> now. >> > > How is the parallelization of the build with OCamlMakefile? > > Is it good (i.e. faster than ocamlbuild)? > > F. > > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/**arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-**bugs > --f46d043be1a6d6843f04e2630765 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

make -j<number > should work.

On Jul 26, 2013 3:10 AM, "Francois Berenger= " <berenger@riken.jp> w= rote:
On 07/26/2013 06:45 AM, Martin DeMello wrote:
On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 6:39 AM, Marek Kubica <marek@xivilization.net> wrote:

I would like to gather thoughts on that in the ocaml.org website,
because actually its advice is 'make + OcamlMakefile' and 'Omak= e',
and I am not sure it is the best advice.

I suppose this advice used to be good, but today maybe not as much
anymore.

I have an old (and fairly small) project that I've tried at least
thrice to migrate off OcamlMakefile to something more
modern/ocaml-specific, and failed each time (after spending 1-2
evenings on it). I'll give it another go and report back on my
experience, but at least historically OCamlMakefile was the easiest
thing to get up and running.
>
You can see the pretty simple makefile here:
https://github.com/martindemello/varix/blob/ma= ster/makefile - I can't
remember exactly what difficulties I had with ocamlbuild and omake
now.

How is the parallelization of the build with OCamlMakefile?

Is it good (i.e. faster than ocamlbuild)?

F.


--
Caml-list mailing list. =A0Subscription management and archives:
ht= tps://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners<= /a>
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
--f46d043be1a6d6843f04e2630765--