My recommendation is to commit fully to the new C++11 standard, which has a
number of functional features, including closures.  These are now supported
by recent C++ compilers.

E.


On Wed, Mar 20, 2013 at 5:23 AM, Kwangkeun Yi <kwang@ropas.snu.ac.kr> wrote:

> Hi OCamlers,
>
> We at Seoul National University are changing our programming curricula so
> that junior CS students will be trained to build rather big softwares.
> After some discussions we decided to use C++ :-(
>
> Is there any good idea on nudging(or even forcing) programming in C++
> become more like programming in OCaml? I want our students to enjoy the
> merits of high-level, higher-order & typed programming language in this
> class even in C++. Would it be possible?
>
> Maybe I need to build some layer of libraries...
> I'd like to hear, if any, more interesting ideas or your experience in
> this context.
>
> All the best,
>
> -Kwang
>
> --
> Prof. Kwangkeun Yi
> Computer Science & Engineering
> Seoul National University
> http://ropas.snu.ac.kr/~kwang
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/**arc/caml-list<https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list>
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/**ocaml_beginners<http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners>
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-**bugs<http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs>
>