From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pBFKqjw3002544 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 21:52:45 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjQBAPZc6k5KfVM2kGdsb2JhbABDhQqmJAgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGBcgEBAQMBEgIPHQEbHgMBCwYFBAcNKgICIQEBEQEFARwZFA6HWJtlCosdSIJrhQZAiHECBQuKY4EWBIg0jEKKbYMJPYQW X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,359,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="135631696" Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 15 Dec 2011 21:52:39 +0100 Received: by eekc50 with SMTP id c50so3399018eek.27 for ; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:39 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=EJ3TfIMIdue/YN67Id6x0oBx9cc6qV/7YWyOlg3pfAA=; b=Pl0FqRSKuYco4R3BSDhalMNuwJWpQlJXPKGu7WI3r593ugXhCsRVIq4rpqr/I9QS/v Wb/afVFe/WU/73KkoIDr0gAf1BHHri24FXehHNFAox/h+zVECnYAu2PZ6DAkVBSdr9a3 LlbMsuivVwgD6Ngl34uSC+YA51dYBUJxmA3Fs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.20.129 with SMTP id f1mr850118ebb.36.1323982359573; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:39 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.29.141 with HTTP; Thu, 15 Dec 2011 12:52:39 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4EE5EF49.80108@frisch.fr> <4EE5F883.2020103@gmail.com> <4EE7547F.9030806@gmail.com> <20111215212021.76bd8501e63bc7c6f95aa4b8@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 15 Dec 2011 15:52:39 -0500 Message-ID: From: Edgar Friendly To: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=000e0ce0ecc23b346204b427aa45 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] About the "mingw" port of OCaml --000e0ce0ecc23b346204b427aa45 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Reply inline On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, ygrek wrote: > On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500 > Edgar Friendly wrote: > > > Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated > > testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments. Batteries is > > definitely benefiting from ygrek's jenkins/hudson server[1] (although it > > must have stopped sending me emails again, as batteries HEAD is unhappy > > and I didn't get notification). > > > > ygrek: could you use more build slaves? > > Sure I could, but I do not have extra hardware resources. Do all the jenkins build slaves have to be in the same place? I assumed it was possible to add remote systems to a jenkins server as build hosts. If this isn't possible, maybe there's someone who wants to contribute to better testing of OCaml packages willing to increase your electricity bill by sending you some hardware. :) > Also setting up ocaml > on windows is a daunting and frustrating exercise, especially so because > some > other libs are needed too (pcre, camomile, etc). > > Batteries now no longer depends on camomile (or any other external library), so that dep is gone. I agree that it's a big pain to get ocaml setup on windows, although things aren't too bad once the groundwork is laid properly. > Concerning the mail notifications - there are no errors in the logs - > maybe the > mails land in gmail's spam folder? Good call - they were all there. My mistake. Hopefully I can keep gmail from spamming them anymore. E. --000e0ce0ecc23b346204b427aa45 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Reply inline

On Thu, Dec 15, 2011 at 2:20 PM, ygrek <<= a href=3D"mailto:ygrekheretix@gmail.com" target=3D"_blank">ygrekheretix@gma= il.com> wrote:
On Tue, 13 Dec 2011 08:34:55 -0500
Edgar Friendly <thelema314@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hmm, I wonder how much the community would benefit from automated
> testing of ocaml packages under a variety of environments. =C2=A0Batte= ries is
> definitely benefiting from ygrek's jenkins/hudson server[1] (altho= ugh it
> must have stopped sending me emails again, as batteries HEAD is unhapp= y
> and I didn't get notification).
>
> ygrek: could you use more build slaves?

Sure I could, but I do not have extra hardware resources.

Do all the jenkins build slaves have to be in the same pla= ce?=C2=A0 I assumed it was possible to add remote systems to a jenkins serv= er as build hosts.=C2=A0 If this isn't possible, maybe there's some= one who wants to contribute to better testing of OCaml packages willing to = increase your electricity bill by sending you some hardware.=C2=A0 :)
=C2=A0
Also setting up ocaml
on windows is a daunting and frustrating exercise, especially so because so= me
other libs are needed too (pcre, camomile, etc).

Batteries now no longer depends on camomile (or= any other external library), so that dep is gone.=C2=A0 I agree that it= 9;s a big pain to get ocaml setup on windows, although things aren't to= o bad once the groundwork is laid properly.
=C2=A0
Concerning the mail notifications - there are no errors in the logs - maybe= the
mails land in gmail's spam folder?

Good cal= l - they were all there.=C2=A0 My mistake.=C2=A0 Hopefully I can keep gmail= from spamming them anymore.=
=C2=A0
E.

--000e0ce0ecc23b346204b427aa45--