Greetings list, I've been trying to make object methods that return polymorphic variants, but it looks a bit stricter than I'm used to. For example, take the following methods: method private method_12 = function | 1 -> `One | _ -> `Two method method_123 = function | 3 -> `Three | x -> self#method_12 x method method_124 = function | 4 -> `Four | x -> self#method_12 x This returns the type: method private method_12 : int -> ([ > `Four | `One | `Three | `Two ] as 'a) method method_123 : int -> 'a method method_124 : int -> 'a and complains that method_123 uses 'a, which is undefined. That's fair enough, since it's an open type in a non-private method. However, if I give method_123 or method_124 a closed type signature it will give the same exact type to the other two methods. What I really want is a signature like this: method private method_12 : int -> [ > `One | `Two ] method method_123 : int -> [ `One | `Two | `Three ] method method_124 : int -> [ `One | `Two | `Four ] If I replace method_12 with a function outside the class it works fine, but for whatever reason method_12 really wants to be the exact same type as method_123 and method_124. Is there any way around this typing requirement for methods? Thanks for any help, Reed Wilson PS. I'd rather avoid doing any verbose "post-processing" of the method_12 result, like this: method_123 = function | 3 -> `Three | x -> (match self#method_12 with `One -> `One | `Two -> `Two) -- รง