From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pA4JnTBQ017234 for ; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:49:29 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AoMBAFdBtE7RVdU2kGdsb2JhbABDhHqlAggiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCGBcgEBAQMBEgIPHQE4AQMBCwEFBQsPAh8HAgIiEgEFARwGGxqHYJhaCosNgyiFL4ktAgUKgSaGZYEWBJQcjTo9gUmCJw X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.69,456,1315173600"; d="scan'208";a="128474690" Received: from mail-yw0-f54.google.com ([209.85.213.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Nov 2011 20:49:23 +0100 Received: by ywt32 with SMTP id 32so4106362ywt.27 for ; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=wIlxE0VynTSmIm75NsENsJqC7wgC7iU1aUjlXE9QFpo=; b=LbSTnoiy4XmQN9tqBRNgZdXvOa1ugxyXoOy5b/hSG67NKovqhmfTBueJYInaHF430O aH0TiPXiVBZ+UbdZRVs5dW6HIoKrC44maGa9EB7+DQJTcueBZsAZuVxRRTHJ4z+WCHRl 9rzFNRNaPrbAqka3WR+u+SkkyTKGiYWYzZb2U= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.173.202 with SMTP id v50mr19195019yhl.102.1320436162385; Fri, 04 Nov 2011 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) Sender: daniel.c.buenzli@gmail.com Received: by 10.147.128.14 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Nov 2011 12:49:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Fri, 4 Nov 2011 20:49:22 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: _rPK1OKRUEEEfbFfH7p2a7W8BQE Message-ID: From: =?UTF-8?Q?Daniel_B=C3=BCnzli?= To: Jun Furuse Cc: caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: Jump-to-definition and type-aware completion for Caml (was : Argot 1.0 release) > If you do not trust me (and you should not :-) ) I trust no one anyway... The problem is more what Gabriel perfectly captured by : > Beware that all those projects tend to be built as patches to the > ocaml distribution, which means difficult deployment (which means few > users, which means few maintenance, which means bitrot). Best, Daniel