From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2DCE7EE25 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 14:18:46 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of mshinwell@janestreet.com) identity=pra; client-ip=38.105.200.229; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mshinwell@janestreet.com"; x-sender="mshinwell@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of mshinwell@janestreet.com designates 38.105.200.229 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=38.105.200.229; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mshinwell@janestreet.com"; x-sender="mshinwell@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@tot-dmz-mxout1.janestreet.com) identity=helo; client-ip=38.105.200.229; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="mshinwell@janestreet.com"; x-sender="postmaster@tot-dmz-mxout1.janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuMBAGRjblImacjlnGdsb2JhbABZDoQFvmSBGh4OAQEBAQEGFgk8giUBAQVAAQEsCwEPCwsNLiISAQUBHAYTiAcDAplxiw2EUwEFjkEGj1UHhCyYDZAbGCmEEls X-IPAS-Result: AuMBAGRjblImacjlnGdsb2JhbABZDoQFvmSBGh4OAQEBAQEGFgk8giUBAQVAAQEsCwEPCwsNLiISAQUBHAYTiAcDAplxiw2EUwEFjkEGj1UHhCyYDZAbGCmEEls X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.93,586,1378850400"; d="scan'208";a="39169646" Received: from mx5.janestreet.com (HELO tot-dmz-mxout1.janestreet.com) ([38.105.200.229]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 28 Oct 2013 14:18:38 +0100 Received: from tot-oib-smtp1.delacy.com ([172.27.22.15] helo=tot-smtp) by tot-dmz-mxout1.janestreet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VamiS-0001e5-Sa for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:18:44 -0400 Received: from tot-dmz-mxgoog1.delacy.com ([172.27.224.14] helo=mxgoog2.janestreet.com) by tot-smtp with esmtps (TLSv1:AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1VamiS-0005eU-RR for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:18:44 -0400 Received: from mail-vc0-f180.google.com ([209.85.220.180]) by mxgoog2.janestreet.com with esmtp (Exim 4.76) (envelope-from ) id 1VamiS-0000qo-Nn for caml-list@inria.fr; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:18:44 -0400 Received: by mail-vc0-f180.google.com with SMTP id lc6so2042235vcb.39 for ; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=lDxTgW4IXkNfmwlXbba5L3qt48LZ+GNeXZ7JYi2Edso=; b=scaZ1QOIJvmOM4dMIAdaXWqrJbqz7hl8M6uoS/LkP9kUViUZ8JUvpO9gv9rq5zKX56 jRDvjXTZxeXL44jt9mgA6+n2OoluMpGrixIgViW2FylJ88jd4/XxGbV0lfIfExjkzMSJ aryvuD5bCuRrK8Y7kUSq6AptmxCuwccm8UcFU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=lDxTgW4IXkNfmwlXbba5L3qt48LZ+GNeXZ7JYi2Edso=; b=IviefaWiENuqMAS673H10ne3vTcwHs+cvpRIQUoCW7PEAcSfBzad9OT2vPfkPtjMNS v0NDrzohm7U3V/+vHEcgO+H1O1NQIuXwn4dg58zP0gVBc/Z3wBpXyULvuBu0R4f8JyEb 8aslcSN2Mp1BtOOT6zXUbImbLjGM9AbL/3BSgY7Cmx7dkHxO8FeiEZRmRIb98098rr1j Gr1X0aFpANu/5abMRb5Ku8rhVR8vjUBszTEFtbMOQBFQsL7JDjoTjRSUobUherUHuify Dei13lJOSNU72QZcbq7bSPckQFhc6Ra+mGEk4k0L4KM1H+6cBnciYqYecA/lNGpp+xd0 ik6g== X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQl8BZy1IHR8+xkYQK2cwUhx0F3o+2FMhsfVTmnHYrn5bafOirc7IT87dL25jpS16hCAS7C4IUZJDRaPa51YsLnakIOtGNMJUNoGr0Y1eO1hzLkuRDy+yN1H/Li4dTa45AAamvR57GqXkG11g7Ia/kIai1goMg== X-Received: by 10.221.47.193 with SMTP id ut1mr13209515vcb.8.1382966324582; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.221.47.193 with SMTP id ut1mr13209513vcb.8.1382966324523; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.58.144.198 with HTTP; Mon, 28 Oct 2013 06:18:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <526D5AF9.9030303@coherentgraphics.co.uk> <20131028144215.3e546e24@kiwi.local.tld> Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2013 09:18:44 -0400 Message-ID: From: Mark Shinwell To: Jacques Garrigue Cc: Yaron Minsky , ygrek , "caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Validation-by: mshinwell@janestreet.com Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Should -strict-sequence become the default? On 28 October 2013 09:08, Jacques Garrigue wrote: > This said, I personally do not like the statement warning, and I'm not a big > fan of > -strict-sequence either, as both require changes in APIs. I'm very much in favour of making -strict-sequence the default. It doesn't seem to me that, given suitable notice disseminated through this mailing list, the change is overly disruptive. (The fixing of code should largely be a mechanical process; and the error can be quickly turned off in the event of having a particularly problematic source file.) Mark