caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Mark Shinwell <mshinwell@janestreet.com>
To: Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inria.fr>
Cc: "caml-list@inria.fr" <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml release roadmap
Date: Mon, 11 May 2015 09:31:03 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAM3Ki77cyDFyJeyoxVM6zzd0YVGQE1tVUuEM1aLPD=rtzDv5AA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <555096AB.9090208@inria.fr>

I can answer two of your points:

I think it's unlikely that multicore support is going to be in a
production-ready state for 4.03, although I may be proven wrong.  It
seems plausible that a beta version of the support will be ready at
that time, however.

Degradation of the performance of code not using the new parallelism
features (but possibly using the existing thread support) is a matter
of serious concern for some users, and best efforts will be made to
minimize or eliminate it.  We will know more on this front in the next
few months.

Mark

On 11 May 2015 at 07:46, Francois Berenger <francois.berenger@inria.fr> wrote:
> On 05/06/2015 07:24 PM, Damien Doligez wrote:
>>
>> Dear OCaml users,
>>
>> We are now preparing release 4.02.2, mostly a bug-fix release with a
>> few new features. We are planning to release it in the first week of
>> June (about 1 month from now). If you want to try a preview, get it:
>>    - from github: < https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml/tree/4.02 > (don't
>> forget to switch to branch 4.02 after cloning)
>>    - through OPAM: opam switch 4.02.0+trunk (watch out for the misnomer)
>> If you find bugs, please report them as quickly as possible.
>>
>> As for the next major release, it will include a number of new
>> features (including, if all goes well, support for multicore). It will
>> be released some time around the end of this year.
>
>
> Who added the support for multicore?
>
> Will it have an impact on the performance of sequential programs (i.e. which
> don't use multicore)?
>
> Does it mean we will be able to write parallel code that scales better
> than what we currently can get with parmap?
> I.e. we could see a speedup even if the task is very fine grain.
>
> Will we have to rewrite Parmap ? ;)
>
>> -- Damien Doligez for the OCaml development team
>>
>
> --
> Regards,
> Francois.
>
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

  reply	other threads:[~2015-05-11 13:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-05-06 17:24 Damien Doligez
2015-05-11 11:46 ` Francois Berenger
2015-05-11 13:31   ` Mark Shinwell [this message]
2015-05-11 13:31     ` Mark Shinwell
2015-05-26 17:13     ` Richard W.M. Jones
2015-06-04 20:34       ` Damien Doligez
2015-05-13 13:20 ` Jonas Jensen
2015-05-14 20:51   ` Damien Doligez
2015-05-14 21:20     ` Gabriel Scherer

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAM3Ki77cyDFyJeyoxVM6zzd0YVGQE1tVUuEM1aLPD=rtzDv5AA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=mshinwell@janestreet.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=francois.berenger@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).