caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Ömer Sinan Ağacan" <omeragacan@gmail.com>
To: caml-list@inria.fr
Subject: [Caml-list] OCaml binary formats -- how are they linked?
Date: Fri, 14 Jun 2013 12:30:15 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMQQO3n6mtrOAXkn9P=xZehkXo29Y8cVxHVzWNMQYeUwQ0h_oA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)

Hi all,

Let's say I have a C API called from OCaml. Bindings are compiled to
.cma, .cmx, .cmxa files.

What I'm wondering is that are those C objects linked to those binary
files statically or dynamically?

Basically what I want to do is to link two different versions of those
C objects(but they share same API, only difference is some assertions
and debug info is enabled in one version but disabled in other) with
minimal effort. If I want to enable debug info, I link one version of
compiled C object files, and if I want to operate faster I link other
version.

Now if those C objects are linked to .cma, .cmx, .cmxa, etc. files
statically, I think I have to compile those OCaml files with this
different versions of C objects, is that correct?

My guess is that those C objects are linked statically, because to
compile my program with this library, I only needed to point to
compiler .cma files. I'm not passing any parameters to show C object
files' location. I still wanted to be 100% sure about that.

And if those C objects are linked statically, is there a parameter or
something to force them to be linked dynamically?

Thanks,


---
Ömer Sinan Ağacan
http://osa1.net

             reply	other threads:[~2013-06-14  9:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2013-06-14  9:30 Ömer Sinan Ağacan [this message]
2013-06-14 10:16 ` [Caml-list] " Dawid Toton
2013-06-14 12:02   ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2013-06-14 14:26     ` Dawid Toton
2013-06-14 19:17       ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2013-06-17  0:18         ` Philippe Wang
2013-06-17 12:12           ` Ömer Sinan Ağacan
2013-06-17 12:34             ` Philippe Wang

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to='CAMQQO3n6mtrOAXkn9P=xZehkXo29Y8cVxHVzWNMQYeUwQ0h_oA@mail.gmail.com' \
    --to=omeragacan@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).