From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id p8T6aWXB017981 for ; Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:36:32 +0200 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AiUBAG8RhE7RVdivkGdsb2JhbABBp34IFAEBAQEJCQ0HFAQigVMBAQEBAxICLAEbHQEDDAYFCw0uIQEBEQEFARwGEwgaonQKi02CXIULO4huAgQGhwYEh2yLaooagnU9g3I X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,459,1312149600"; d="scan'208";a="111072752" Received: from mail-qy0-f175.google.com ([209.85.216.175]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 29 Sep 2011 08:36:23 +0200 Received: by qyk10 with SMTP id 10so3736071qyk.6 for ; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=JMbMxGaZ2L7+U5oRDkD4IVjNuunbzkgJnz1sb7sLiAU=; b=kK/OkVnD+tHOD76gSRzw8PxMVmhLk+XYhlH7DzqG4wc6uCBGMotoLFXNy2PmUxTBkp yuXCun+ilsekkzaeZb6Edfid4L55DoOrhJKIZjADACz2TUYWz00g7mE/bqnk0iN1KD/v KCdkdvRkSn9bJ3ziCQOspxlUQLcqFU7+pELfE= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.2.103 with SMTP id 39mr7462373qci.177.1317278182666; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.98.212 with HTTP; Wed, 28 Sep 2011 23:36:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <4E837439.2060804@free.fr> <4E838281.9000909@free.fr> Date: Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:36:22 +0400 Message-ID: From: Dmitry Bely To: Kakadu Cc: Caml List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] announce: ODT 2.0 released On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 12:28 AM, Kakadu wrote: > > I catched the version, but it's better to specify what sort of Eclipse needed: CDT, RCP, JEE, C++ or something else These are just different plugins prepackaged into Eclipse distribution; if you plan to use ODT only, any flavor will fit. And you can install any additional plugins later. BTW, if you consider Eclipse as a development platform, try also OcaIDE. Until recently (I have not tried ODT 2.0) it was more feature-rich than ODT. - Dmitry Bely