From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D9AC57EF5E for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 15:47:50 +0200 (CEST) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:gLyndBQIHi7ULxUBVj0LIHcMrNpsv+yvbD5Q0YIujvd0So/mwa65ZhON2/xhgRfzUJnB7Loc0qyN4vimBTBLvM3JmUtBWaQEbwUCh8QSkl5oK+++Imq/EsTXaTcnFt9JTl5v8iLzG0FUHMHjew+a+SXqvnYsExnyfTB4Ov7yUtaLyZ/mj6bup9aOOE1hv3mUWftKNhK4rAHc5IE9oLBJDeIP8CbPuWZCYO9MxGlldhq5lhf44dqsrtY4q3wD89pozcNLUL37cqIkVvQYSW1+ayFm0vb2rgHORhej4X4VU2Ne0kYZQluN0Bavcp7rsyyyiud8yCSbJ8S+Gbw9QzWlqbtmSQ/liT0OHzg9/XDLh8o2h6Ve9lbprBV6x8vQYZqJfK51d6bZONcbXnZpX8BLViUHDJnqPKUVCO9Ud8ZVvYT+plIO5T74TSKlHv/+gHcchnLk9fU90KImCw6Qj19oJM4HrHmB9Ia9D6wVS+3gifSRwA== Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=hez@0ok.org; spf=None smtp.mailfrom=hez@0ok.org; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hez@0ok.org) identity=pra; client-ip=208.113.200.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="hez@0ok.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hez@0ok.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=208.113.200.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="hez@0ok.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com) identity=helo; client-ip=208.113.200.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="postmaster@homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BPAADw6IhXh1PIcdBchBR8pAABAQaDMow1hQSBeyKFeAKBZBQBAQEBAQEBAREBAQEKCwkJIS+CMgQBEoIUAQQBEhEdLgwECwsEBxodAgIiEgEFAQoSBgESEgIOh3QDDwgOo2qBMT4xizuESoU7A4QtAQEBBwEBAQEBAQEBFwiFYoUVhG2CVIJahloMkkABhhKISII5jHyOXDCBDw8PglKBV26GUwEBAQ X-IPAS-Result: A0BPAADw6IhXh1PIcdBchBR8pAABAQaDMow1hQSBeyKFeAKBZBQBAQEBAQEBAREBAQEKCwkJIS+CMgQBEoIUAQQBEhEdLgwECwsEBxodAgIiEgEFAQoSBgESEgIOh3QDDwgOo2qBMT4xizuESoU7A4QtAQEBBwEBAQEBAQEBFwiFYoUVhG2CVIJahloMkkABhhKISII5jHyOXDCBDw8PglKBV26GUwEBAQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.28,368,1464645600"; d="scan'208,217";a="226809249" Received: from caibbdcaaaid.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com) ([208.113.200.83]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 15 Jul 2016 15:47:49 +0200 Received: from homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 347D260004A5D for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:47:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=0ok.org; h=mime-version :references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; s=0ok.org; bh=22AzogD3wLJ957fSZszDy5kkNPg=; b=L8l SmzRmhW+cXeGH1z2frnpMyWZe4WL4g1V+jQSpb+54xhmHtMGItjlvfxSdwMf3qFS Lx/x/ZJhmQ+0vYdWGIYLoRYLn4trSxPNHPeZYE4DYyYXvhDHxjZdGAYjKZ/wITmn V0EP0WNLrViMKxVAc90AmgsBMy/W4V24C8pI9Qb0= Received: from mail-vk0-f50.google.com (mail-vk0-f50.google.com [209.85.213.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hez@0ok.org) by homiemail-a126.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1662460004A5C for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:47:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by mail-vk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id w127so97434479vkh.2 for ; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:47:46 -0700 (PDT) X-Gm-Message-State: ALyK8tIaLtmWzd6f7xOLaiPME8+iaIt0vFKGz1dNp+p3jFTJZq4kwcbywANh+KCxZLRlmJ6dJSi/EGRMNLBzaA== X-Received: by 10.176.1.214 with SMTP id 80mr8951591ual.129.1468590465322; Fri, 15 Jul 2016 06:47:45 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 References: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> In-Reply-To: <9ab1f1de347c6531e51d0757e140a49c@nleyten.com> From: "Hezekiah M. Carty" Date: Fri, 15 Jul 2016 13:47:35 +0000 X-Gmail-Original-Message-ID: Message-ID: To: Dario Teixeira , caml-list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113f029601a82c0537acddd2 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ZeroMQ vs Nanomsg --001a113f029601a82c0537acddd2 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Hello, I've been using the zeromq bindings for the last six years or so. zeromq has been very nice in my experience - excellent documentation and a helpful community. The current and past maintainers of the zeromq bindings have been very easy to work with. I wrote the Lwt interface for zeromq - feedback on that piece is welcome. I started looking at nanomsg shortly before its original author/maintainer quit the project. I stopped seriously considering nanomsg for my projects at that point. I'm happy to hear that maintenance has been picked back up though. And to echo Simon Cruanes's comment, rgrinberg is also very easy to work with! Hez On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 6:59 AM Dario Teixeira wrote: > Hi, > > I'm evaluating ZeroMQ and Nanomsg for the middleware of a distributed > application. Now, I know both projects have had a fair share of drama > in the past, to the point that it's hard for an outside observer to be > up-to-date on the *current* strengths and weaknesses of each one. > Still, > it's my understanding that though ZeroMQ is more established, Nanomsg > was > developed later by one of the original authors of ZeroMQ, and supposedly > fixes some of the architectural mistakes of ZeroMQ. To complicate > matters, > Nanomsg's author quit the project a while ago, leaving it in limbo for > a while. In the meantime, it seems development has picked up again, and > Nanomsg recently had its 1.0 release. > > Anyway, I'm sure the picture I painted above is incomplete. Therefore, > I would be much obliged to hear your opinions and experiences with > either > project. I will be using the OCaml bindings, obviously, so the maturity > of > the bindings is also a factor. (On first glance they seem quite > complete > and both offer support for LWT, which is a must.) > > Thanks in advance for your time! > Kind regards, > Dario Teixeira > > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > --001a113f029601a82c0537acddd2 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Hello,

I've been using the zeromq b= indings for the last six years or so. =C2=A0zeromq has been very nice in my= experience - excellent documentation and a helpful community.=C2=A0 The cu= rrent and past maintainers of the zeromq bindings have been very easy to wo= rk with.=C2=A0 I wrote the Lwt interface for zeromq - feedback on that piec= e is welcome.

I started looking at nanomsg shortly= before its original author/maintainer quit the project.=C2=A0 I stopped se= riously considering nanomsg for my projects at that point.=C2=A0 I'm ha= ppy to hear that maintenance has been picked back up though.=C2=A0 And to e= cho Simon Cruanes's comment, rgrinberg is also very easy to work with!<= br>
Hez

On Fri, Jul 1= 5, 2016 at 6:59 AM Dario Teixeira <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com> wrote:
Hi,

I'm evaluating ZeroMQ and Nanomsg for the middleware of a distributed application.=C2=A0 Now, I know both projects have had a fair share of drama=
in the past, to the point that it's hard for an outside observer to be<= br> up-to-date on the *current* strengths and weaknesses of each one.
Still,
it's my understanding that though ZeroMQ is more established, Nanomsg was
developed later by one of the original authors of ZeroMQ, and supposedly
fixes some of the architectural mistakes of ZeroMQ.=C2=A0 To complicate
matters,
Nanomsg's author quit the project a while ago, leaving it in limbo for<= br> a while.=C2=A0 In the meantime, it seems development has picked up again, a= nd
Nanomsg recently had its 1.0 release.

Anyway, I'm sure the picture I painted above is incomplete.=C2=A0 There= fore,
I would be much obliged to hear your opinions and experiences with
either
project.=C2=A0 I will be using the OCaml bindings, obviously, so the maturi= ty
of
the bindings is also a factor.=C2=A0 (On first glance they seem quite
complete
and both offer support for LWT, which is a must.)

Thanks in advance for your time!
Kind regards,
Dario Teixeira


--
Caml-list mailing list.=C2=A0 Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocam= l_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
--001a113f029601a82c0537acddd2--