From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1A8B37EE49 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:26:01 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hez@0ok.org) identity=pra; client-ip=208.97.132.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="hez@0ok.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of hez@0ok.org) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=208.97.132.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="hez@0ok.org"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com) identity=helo; client-ip=208.97.132.83; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="hez@0ok.org"; x-sender="postmaster@homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggBAFZjJ1HQYYRTemdsb2JhbABEhk66U4EBHg4BARQoAySCHwEBBSMdAwE1AQEOCwsNAgImAgIhARIBBQEcBhMIh3gDD6EoinJxg1AChQwNiUcBBoEjixSBI4EBMweCLYETiGuKEgOBYIFdi0yDNRYphEiBTQ X-IPAS-Result: AggBAFZjJ1HQYYRTemdsb2JhbABEhk66U4EBHg4BARQoAySCHwEBBSMdAwE1AQEOCwsNAgImAgIhARIBBQEcBhMIh3gDD6EoinJxg1AChQwNiUcBBoEjixSBI4EBMweCLYETiGuKEgOBYIFdi0yDNRYphEiBTQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,715,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="4061118" Received: from caiajhbdcaid.dreamhost.com (HELO homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com) ([208.97.132.83]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP; 22 Feb 2013 13:25:59 +0100 Received: from homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 647A61DE058 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:25:58 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=0ok.org; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; q=dns; s=0ok.org; b=aij M3xvjJ4p5cHY3CFTQe6B/8z5TYhh81duGBgnZuV3ZYaSDzAuhms4kSl/AsXUgUzg yr4U5DmVZ4+FBNjyZseo7TiRA7737baxwKdtXdikv461wkSmzCTAhsy+CtA/wb82 RpLamm7srJLgYo8uo91ff0+lvZRrgArVfLf205vM= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed; d=0ok.org; h=mime-version :in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to:cc :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; s=0ok.org; bh=UFOCWRcCy rnhq1ok+CGiwx3ZoKQ=; b=gwCbzivYRV5Yqu1J/nqJjYhT8wDEZ1vVXPEi/URQg IF0Gs2DpHhFeEl4hbf2wuSmS8ai5KZTL+VRi4Gn8JNXaBXhrZD/WPRfQHJJyV3N/ lifec7KGMUm2k4DlWjp1+Sn2oHXyG0kdtEW69k6TB762Aq0iL0zY4j2wrfcty2lm 40= Received: from mail-qe0-f46.google.com (mail-qe0-f46.google.com [209.85.128.46]) (using TLSv1 with cipher RC4-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: hez@0ok.org) by homiemail-a84.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 438941DE05D for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:25:58 -0800 (PST) Received: by mail-qe0-f46.google.com with SMTP id 1so284225qec.33 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:25:57 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=google.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding :x-gm-message-state; bh=FgP8wGQD7dSp6s1URkcS/w48ClWVIOYh05+G5rre46c=; b=Sj9tJGK9IUAI//oAIkyvV906aiX68FrbmMDxmY3dyzuYnAPTSQx6bTf1wmqVtCP/Ad dr1OURCeNk2otiyIxWYuGhDvr8eI9UN8MgefxLb6sAnt/1fy9p1Cn5B1eYYaSKRJSfhb qfLN2uLHISHi0y+gZ5EZ+nqxJ6g1TnXkfPl8Wj1cYjx6hTgKfUHFSGVBKCLjz1ZNtip5 a69cB3oOmVIzY/oAEVg8JxrZh1AKSC7vRZ+61GXqAmkaMgCjjx9h3dVMxe3Pg1MPAgHO kwU2SoySnusJ7bkVu0ELa7HwEwzT2pblC5nG1V5opZN0GICWBdIxoWEmNhEOxrAIWhg0 biMw== X-Received: by 10.49.73.105 with SMTP id k9mr747949qev.6.1361535957228; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:25:57 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.49.98.168 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 04:25:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <9887FE99-F0FA-4F3A-B415-D54A610E93B7@recoil.org> References: <9887FE99-F0FA-4F3A-B415-D54A610E93B7@recoil.org> From: "Hezekiah M. Carty" Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 07:25:37 -0500 Message-ID: To: Anil Madhavapeddy Cc: =?UTF-8?Q?=C3=96mer_Sinan_A=C4=9Facan?= , OCaml Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Gm-Message-State: ALoCoQlzs+B3GyTJ8O+ZU1kyJe+INTtywQDQTtrIsDuJjXoARRl5zkZZ1LTtH2vcGI8Yd4tYI+hG Subject: Re: [Caml-list] opam package problem - can't install easy-format On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 7:12 AM, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote: > On 22 Feb 2013, at 12:08, =C3=96mer Sinan A=C4=9Facan wrote: >> >>> It's likely that you don't have the latest version of OPAM (0.9.3), sin= ce >>> patch handling was changed to make it more robust. Do also let us know >>> the compiler version you are running with in the bug report. >> >> You're right. I was still using a beta version of it even though I run >> `opam upgrade`. Now I installed 0.9.3 and installation worked fine. > > OPAM doesn't upgrade itself, although we did flirt with the idea in the > early versions. This will all cease to be a problem when the binary > packages start flowing (already the case in Arch Linux, and soon a PPA > on Ubuntu). > Given this lack of support - what is the proper way to upgrade opam? Does it require using a different opam root? Is there an easy way to dump the currently installed compilers + packages and easily ingest this list into an upgraded opam? Hez