On Fri, Jul 15, 2016 at 11:58 AM Dario Teixeira <dario.teixeira@nleyten.com> wrote:

> I started looking at nanomsg shortly before its original
> author/maintainer quit the project. I stopped seriously considering
> nanomsg for my projects at that point. I'm happy to hear that
> maintenance has been picked back up though. And to echo Simon
> Cruanes's comment, rgrinberg is also very easy to work with!

Did you look at Nanomsg purely out of curiosity, or did it offer
something that you found lacking in ZeroMQ?

Mostly curiosity. I was pretty happy with zeromq but wanted to see what nanomsg had to offer. There were some intriguing socket/pattern/protocols in nanomsg (BUS and SURVEY for example) but the better documentation in zeromq won out because of all the clear examples of the benefits and pitfalls of zeromq's various socket types.

Hez