On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Anthony Tavener
<anthony.tavener@gmail.com>wrote:

This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about
> module-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other"?
>

You never know if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say
yes, you should be concerned.


Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would you
> really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a
> library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn't
> possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names!
>

Good point. So, I guess I'm saying try hard for a short intuitive name
first, but yes, sometimes it's not possible.