From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 753BB7EC6E for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 16:40:27 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.128.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.50 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.128.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qe0-f50.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.128.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qe0-f50.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhQEAGjBsVLRVYAylGdsb2JhbABZhBe4YoETCBYOAQEBAQcLCwkSKoImAQEEQAEbHQEDDAYFBAc7IQEBEQEFARwGE4dvAQMRpSOMWoMJjUAKGScNZIYYEQEFDIxzghMHhDYEiUOMaIFrjFqDTRgphHUe X-IPAS-Result: AhQEAGjBsVLRVYAylGdsb2JhbABZhBe4YoETCBYOAQEBAQcLCwkSKoImAQEEQAEbHQEDDAYFBAc7IQEBEQEFARwGE4dvAQMRpSOMWoMJjUAKGScNZIYYEQEFDIxzghMHhDYEiUOMaIFrjFqDTRgphHUe X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,508,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="49569512" Received: from mail-qe0-f50.google.com ([209.85.128.50]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Dec 2013 16:40:26 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f50.google.com with SMTP id 1so6589184qec.37 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:40:26 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=siMZp/PiQzORiCcRJIPTSCpinT/ldSPALJlRz7VM+g4=; b=ie1EWO6yQFsS6WRztVEukSmZIvu2qJrw8VlMqVlSusrEZbes3YE55Eh5MfyAbnMLCp 9JK2Nf+aqbCC7+ARYpd088TQBMefXSJcWaszw/kPiqNn08I27jn6dI+4afKSjY2c5sEr ybqtoaZWX/Ez6t8oDI5ZRikrAtIj3ynOilpj6/zx+4h7wQwQibAjlviHdHEl1N8O0lIK wkfbQseOZRxxWCONCiC0G4uWbj/g2ihXFLM5KqO5k2VtUcwX9L95HYiRVg8kACYVvOd2 U1x9VDmbMymJNx4foJ2w0dOpqkSMaHnQ65EmyPRjcscL0zmvkbCnsQvmec/CJulyFRPM GYUg== X-Received: by 10.49.106.37 with SMTP id gr5mr54436557qeb.75.1387381225997; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:40:25 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.8.8 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 07:40:05 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4DDEBB7487B641C0834F09D522EA9918@erratique.ch> <1C9496037B6149EC970D65C3BFA490F7@erratique.ch> From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:40:05 -0500 Message-ID: To: Anthony Tavener Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= , caml list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7b6da24024e4e604edd0dd48 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SDL2 bindings, testers and feedback welcome --047d7b6da24024e4e604edd0dd48 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Anthony Tavener wrote: This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about > module-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other"? > You never know if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say yes, you should be concerned. Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would you > really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a > library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn't > possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names! > Good point. So, I guess I'm saying try hard for a short intuitive name first, but yes, sometimes it's not possible. --047d7b6da24024e4e604edd0dd48 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= ue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gma= il.com> wrote:

This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about modu= le-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other&q= uot;?

You never kno= w if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say yes, you shoul= d be concerned.


Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would y= ou really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a = library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn&= #39;t possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names!

Good point. So, I guess I'm sayi= ng try hard for a short intuitive name first, but yes, sometimes it's n= ot possible.

--047d7b6da24024e4e604edd0dd48--