From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D0CD7EE94 for ; Tue, 25 Dec 2012 02:14:49 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.169; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.169 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.169; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ie0-f169.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.169; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f169.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AisDAJD92FDRVd+plGdsb2JhbABEgkmyBIkaCBYOAQEBAQkJCwkSKYIfAQVAARsdAQMMBgUEBzsiAREBBQEcBhOIAAEDDwyXWYwzgnuENQoZJw1ZiHYBBQyMS4RDA4hijSqBHIodgy8WKYQz X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,351,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="187513951" Received: from mail-ie0-f169.google.com ([209.85.223.169]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 25 Dec 2012 02:14:48 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f169.google.com with SMTP id c14so9536625ieb.28 for ; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:14:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=ge+v5xco+fAksN5CZioEJBO/CUXBebEJhVPEm98/kMI=; b=mnq2oj1P0EawEidj7/fETOqSQguOSnlZM/u5QpKySuDjPD6LymqCzloDk6qy9Lje5E dqx/BtvpSWPPp5eMcImG1jCpSsfTIRoSy57U3eHuNUGI2AB1TKBM40sMqNg0QtKvw50j PBn2GF4zcFBGMVmla8HyDZd4AQobFtRPXgtH2DW1pLvR+1QalJonfb736zNeebFGiIFJ tDmQ2DQ1RiH4c45ytm3j4buURZB2RJo3T/AuwQylfXhUVaPVRk/sqJJuFw8Ba34pMaZq xPKYhw5AtbLGHnJvlNOft2GaP8mh5FBbsC4IRndbDAjE5PLJOI9/lKJfJzZzEf18EC4+ JtiA== Received: by 10.50.197.169 with SMTP id iv9mr20255563igc.32.1356398087620; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:14:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.47.229 with HTTP; Mon, 24 Dec 2012 17:14:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201212231553.39806.vincent.balat@univ-paris-diderot.fr> References: <201212211720.37298.vincent.balat@univ-paris-diderot.fr> <201212231553.39806.vincent.balat@univ-paris-diderot.fr> From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Mon, 24 Dec 2012 20:14:27 -0500 Message-ID: To: Vincent Balat Cc: caml-list@inria.fr, Wojciech Meyer Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae93404c52fc7a804d1a30a16 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OCaml wiki --14dae93404c52fc7a804d1a30a16 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Balat < vincent.balat@univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote: I just don't want to call 1.0 something that is too difficult to install or > that is badly documented. > That's a good policy. Why not giving it a try? We can install and configure it if you want. > I'd like to test it out, but the issue is of course time. We currently have 37 open issues [1] on the ocaml.org repo, and that doesn't include any of the requests made over the last few days on this list. Those items need to take priority before we start investigating new implementation technologies. But if you can configure an installation for us, that'll be a nice start. More people-hours will be a big help! [1] https://github.com/ocaml/ocaml.org/issues?state=open --14dae93404c52fc7a804d1a30a16 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Sun, Dec 23, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Vincent Balat <vincent.= balat@univ-paris-diderot.fr> wrote:

I just don't want to call 1.0 something that is too difficult to instal= l or that is badly documented.


Th= at's a good policy.

Why not giving it a try? We can in= stall and configure it if you want.


I'd like to test it out, but the= issue is of course time. We currently have 37 open issues [1] on the ocaml.org repo, and that doesn't include an= y of the requests made over the last few days on this list. Those items nee= d to take priority before we start investigating new implementation technol= ogies. But if you can configure an installation for us, that'll be a ni= ce start. More people-hours will be a big help!


--14dae93404c52fc7a804d1a30a16--