From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A736C7EE51 for ; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 16:18:57 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.171; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.171 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.171; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ie0-f171.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.171; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f171.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsMBANU5XFHRVd+rm2dsb2JhbABDw3uBAwgWDgEBAQEBBgsLCRQoghYJAQEEAUABGwwRAQMBCwYFAwEHAzgiAREBBQEcBhOIAQEDCQaiVIwvgnuETwoZJw1ZiHwBBQyPDQeDQAOWa48pFimESiA X-IPAS-Result: AsMBANU5XFHRVd+rm2dsb2JhbABDw3uBAwgWDgEBAQEBBgsLCRQoghYJAQEEAUABGwwRAQMBCwYFAwEHAzgiAREBBQEcBhOIAQEDCQaiVIwvgnuETwoZJw1ZiHwBBQyPDQeDQAOWa48pFimESiA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.87,401,1363129200"; d="scan'208";a="11612540" Received: from mail-ie0-f171.google.com ([209.85.223.171]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Apr 2013 16:18:56 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f171.google.com with SMTP id e14so1715470iej.2 for ; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to:cc:content-type; bh=TNIFopPUYiVbBZlBnbHEDxxHhqjf9h9IQbQqALxi7LA=; b=jVxVy4vid7y0L8uinHQwqvDLJOye8SbdmMr4/tEtzj4HGSxBhHEXbEU1t1p2E8zJfH BAPraeiMtadhVBo7nZknrteXMKK/Qv/+IM994A3L0qyN9U7IABFtRW5T7zbBHvAJWHRo GUZiQ0cbABhR6/l1YM9FJ90rHFY2FE6HM+/jR8b3rDHVcevekfSXtuIimZ252WUNJUud pkaJrEfxDpo3x6j4tQAxQwiFsPC81F+mQcaJfRbEhAS7F0I1OuoAR8zimA5lIHcL9GJn P/9zanx0gTiTK9ETJPIs3ALRzxknDqt8EkctaX9qSJCRBWJtdnYKs+IU5iX7p9VmU1+p KuVQ== X-Received: by 10.50.108.45 with SMTP id hh13mr7444118igb.110.1364998735285; Wed, 03 Apr 2013 07:18:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.64.77.133 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Apr 2013 07:18:35 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1364994641.10138.1@samsung> References: <87a9pg9g3k.fsf@li195-236.members.linode.com> <9C7DC8FA-C5FE-4386-AE81-763D4D68FB1A@recoil.org> <1364994641.10138.1@samsung> From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2013 10:18:35 -0400 Message-ID: To: Gerd Stolpmann Cc: Anil Madhavapeddy , Malcolm Matalka , caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e01493b52bc543d04d9758836 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] OUD2013 part of CUFP? --089e01493b52bc543d04d9758836 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Gerd Stolpmann wrote: > I liked the idea of the first couple of OUD events of keeping some > distance to academic rituals. > I perceive the change in exactly the opposite way. The first couple of OUD events were in Paris, i.e. all about keeping it close to Inria. By co-locating with ICFP/CUFP, the meeting will for the first time be in the US. That means we are reaching out to new people. And remember CUFP is a significant conference, so it is inaccurate to categorize the entire week of events as academic. --089e01493b52bc543d04d9758836 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 9:10 AM, Gerd Stolpmann <info@gerd-stolpmann.d= e> wrote:
=A0
I liked the idea of the first couple of OUD events of keeping some distance= to academic rituals.

I perceive the ch= ange in exactly the opposite way. The first couple of OUD events were in Pa= ris, i.e. all about keeping it close to Inria. By co-locating with ICFP/CUF= P, the meeting will for the first time be in the US. That means we are reac= hing out to new people. And remember CUFP is a significant conference, so i= t is inaccurate to categorize the entire week of events as academic.

--089e01493b52bc543d04d9758836--