From: Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>
To: "Daniel Bünzli" <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Cc: caml list <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SDL2 bindings, testers and feedback welcome
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:29:27 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAMu2m2K8YiZFpSKyuTVe-c3NbHM-kcRGsQTvjJorF2vvtWJHKw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <44B82882F02B44D3B3E298CEF670E59B@erratique.ch>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1005 bytes --]
On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel Bünzli
<daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>wrote:
> Le mercredi, 18 décembre 2013 à 19:02, Yotam Barnoy a écrit :
> > What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer than tsdl to me. Or
> slim_sdl.
>
> Right, I have an idea: let's vote on this !
>
> For the record I'm interested in getting feedback about the design of the
> binding from a usability point of view (especially the result type vs
> exception issue), not in pointless discussions about the name of the
> library. The case has been made for having short toplevel names. The name
> won't change, deal with it or move on making your own with the fucking good
> toplevel name of your choice.
>
You ask for feedback. People are kind enough to spend time giving you some,
but you get angry that the advice is not exactly what you are looking for.
This is a public mailing list, and there is no obligation to discuss only
precisely what you want. You are free to ignore advice you don't like.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1381 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-18 22:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-17 6:11 Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-17 7:02 ` Anthony Tavener
2013-12-17 14:17 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-17 15:14 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-18 6:54 ` Erkki Seppala
2013-12-18 8:05 ` Anthony Tavener
2013-12-18 9:24 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-18 8:18 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-22 10:01 ` Kakadu
2013-12-30 13:28 ` Vu Ngoc San
2013-12-17 17:05 ` Ashish Agarwal
2013-12-17 17:47 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-17 18:57 ` Ashish Agarwal
2013-12-17 19:45 ` Anthony Tavener
2013-12-18 15:40 ` Ashish Agarwal
2013-12-18 18:02 ` Yotam Barnoy
2013-12-18 19:53 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-18 22:29 ` Ashish Agarwal [this message]
2013-12-18 22:45 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-17 20:26 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-18 1:13 ` Francois Berenger
2013-12-18 6:44 ` Erkki Seppala
2013-12-18 9:21 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-19 1:11 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-19 6:39 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-17 19:29 ` Erkki Seppala
2013-12-19 5:20 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-19 5:27 ` Florent Monnier
2013-12-19 7:13 ` Daniel Bünzli
2013-12-19 12:38 ` Florent Monnier
2014-02-12 10:43 ` Daniel Bünzli
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAMu2m2K8YiZFpSKyuTVe-c3NbHM-kcRGsQTvjJorF2vvtWJHKw@mail.gmail.com \
--to=agarwal1975@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
--cc=daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).