From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7D4B57EC6E for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 23:29:49 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.128.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.128.42 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.128.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qe0-f42.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.128.42; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qe0-f42.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AggPAK4gslLRVYAqlWdsb2JhbABZhBe5IEFUCBYOAQEBAQcNCQkSKoIlAQEBAwFAARsSCwEDAQsGBQQBBjsiAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDCQilL4xagwmNcQoZJw1khhgRAQUMjwYHhDYBA4lDjlOQJxgphHUe X-IPAS-Result: AggPAK4gslLRVYAqlWdsb2JhbABZhBe5IEFUCBYOAQEBAQcNCQkSKoIlAQEBAwFAARsSCwEDAQsGBQQBBjsiAREBBQEcBhOHbwEDCQilL4xagwmNcQoZJw1khhgRAQUMjwYHhDYBA4lDjlOQJxgphHUe X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,510,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="41635338" Received: from mail-qe0-f42.google.com ([209.85.128.42]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Dec 2013 23:29:48 +0100 Received: by mail-qe0-f42.google.com with SMTP id b4so302669qen.1 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:29:47 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=HgfdOFvDY6Nt94RloV2aFClI1qix8nhYJAsrYrGvBDw=; b=YdoxVdy1usq/maLpe6KQzeNcuUn04o9XQ8pWOD2PsbBEunpmJEpfqwdUlTtWjYBgN0 oGG9fUCuuFmtlDp1gl5qvLW0mrejZUiPwj+ptOTeV86D2aOd+gzsh0bxUv/j1AnNJS4o 6wvWToWersaDctM29b3IiDB1SHaLed6ias8hjGYzugb8HHsUEuX8Yo02cTNAy2I2JvWv YB55M4A227Kj7fgDyXVFUAIz6nSc9ZtLRez13j9cx2yFOxeN2k9+tBMutT8UGWnqSm5K 9CNJB4vAa16XrERu67m5vGE6o/chFaah8Ej07u2ux1Dt/jICujRWx3/iVc8X1l0GU/hi AZvw== X-Received: by 10.49.110.202 with SMTP id ic10mr58391857qeb.18.1387405787329; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:29:47 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.8.8 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 14:29:27 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <44B82882F02B44D3B3E298CEF670E59B@erratique.ch> References: <4DDEBB7487B641C0834F09D522EA9918@erratique.ch> <1C9496037B6149EC970D65C3BFA490F7@erratique.ch> <44B82882F02B44D3B3E298CEF670E59B@erratique.ch> From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 17:29:27 -0500 Message-ID: To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= Cc: caml list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=047d7bd76dfa1cf92604edd69538 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SDL2 bindings, testers and feedback welcome --047d7bd76dfa1cf92604edd69538 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel B=FCnzli wrote: > Le mercredi, 18 d=E9cembre 2013 =E0 19:02, Yotam Barnoy a =E9crit : > > What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer than tsdl to me. Or > slim_sdl. > > Right, I have an idea: let's vote on this ! > > For the record I'm interested in getting feedback about the design of the > binding from a usability point of view (especially the result type vs > exception issue), not in pointless discussions about the name of the > library. The case has been made for having short toplevel names. The name > won't change, deal with it or move on making your own with the fucking go= od > toplevel name of your choice. > You ask for feedback. People are kind enough to spend time giving you some, but you get angry that the advice is not exactly what you are looking for. This is a public mailing list, and there is no obligation to discuss only precisely what you want. You are free to ignore advice you don't like. --047d7bd76dfa1cf92604edd69538 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On W= ed, Dec 18, 2013 at 2:53 PM, Daniel B=FCnzli <daniel.buenzli@er= ratique.ch> wrote:
Le mercredi, 18 d=E9cembre 2013 =E0 19:02, Y= otam Barnoy a =E9crit :
> What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer th= an tsdl to me. Or slim_sdl.

Right, I have an idea: let's vote on this !

For the record I'm interested in getting feedback about the design of t= he binding from a usability point of view (especially the result type vs ex= ception issue), not in pointless discussions about the name of the library.= The case has been made for having short toplevel names. The name won't= change, deal with it or move on making your own with the fucking good topl= evel name of your choice.

You ask for feedback. People are kind enou= gh to spend time giving you some, but you get angry that the advice is not = exactly what you are looking for. This is a public mailing list, and there = is no obligation to discuss only precisely what you want. You are free to i= gnore advice you don't like.

--047d7bd76dfa1cf92604edd69538--