From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D69397F89E for ; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 20:16:20 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.216.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of agarwal1975@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.43 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.216.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qa0-f43.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.216.43; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="agarwal1975@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qa0-f43.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuwEAPGkPVPRVdgreGdsb2JhbABYg0FXuwaIdoEXCBYOARUmKoImAQEEQAEbHQEDDAYFBAEGOyEBAREBBQEcBhOHZAEDEaAdjF+DDpcNChknDWSGUhEBBQyMS4IaB4Q4AQOWboFtgTSLOwKDXhgphHoh X-IPAS-Result: AuwEAPGkPVPRVdgreGdsb2JhbABYg0FXuwaIdoEXCBYOARUmKoImAQEEQAEbHQEDDAYFBAEGOyEBAREBBQEcBhOHZAEDEaAdjF+DDpcNChknDWSGUhEBBQyMS4IaB4Q4AQOWboFtgTSLOwKDXhgphHoh X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,788,1389740400"; d="scan'208";a="55455518" Received: from mail-qa0-f43.google.com ([209.85.216.43]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 03 Apr 2014 20:16:12 +0200 Received: by mail-qa0-f43.google.com with SMTP id j15so2024778qaq.16 for ; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:16:11 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=S9jgEddIA4+Lhab3GmUyuOBV6VZXCyvoF98XYbMEMlI=; b=On8lywlfbGeEs3ASNUNdOHR+JTv0JmPpoZqlWz7g8r8KBDGxGI2N3Gy2fzOxSbvCc1 y4ZwOAQkvAr5yynR6e9JpG83hh0llsPPDLCYq0xgDfwjXGr/N/9a01O9683jC3bALi9n k2ME5pB+iVkFFWwQXSVPC4FPtlCFRAGaV4/9LrtmPFukWvYb8GwaidraRV7DyUXek0V8 KwZcl+8olaWyWUG8lLOpzYbBWWBiFl95Yydppt81dLJfK1UTYfI7qSpka+8RhzmVHHE3 RVqClhbcq+LipsEWsiw911JcgpJcXjH9a0MxRX3yZw8+D2pOgg6hwZB0F4iGkqjkfx43 7PwQ== X-Received: by 10.224.38.209 with SMTP id c17mr9170911qae.11.1396548971761; Thu, 03 Apr 2014 11:16:11 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.67.69 with HTTP; Thu, 3 Apr 2014 11:15:51 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Ashish Agarwal Date: Thu, 3 Apr 2014 14:15:51 -0400 Message-ID: To: Yotam Barnoy Cc: Amir Chaudhry , Ocaml Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a1134a7665f969704f6276521 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Activating wiki on ocaml github --001a1134a7665f969704f6276521 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Thu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Yotam Barnoy wrote: the hierarchy of articles is flat. All of the articles are lumped together > under the heading 'tutorials' when that label doesn't necessarily fit many > of them. I would much rather see a 'Knowledge Base' area, with articles > organized by hierarchies with many-to-many mappings of levels to articles. > I completely agree. Don't feel restricted by the current structure of the content. It too can and should evolve. It seems we're reaching consensus. I'm glad you think the ocaml.org wiki is a reasonable start. Let's see how it goes. However, this thread isn't enough to publicize that option. We should add a link in the footer. --001a1134a7665f969704f6276521 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On T= hu, Apr 3, 2014 at 12:44 PM, Yotam Barnoy <yotambarnoy@gmail.com&g= t; wrote:

the hierarchy of articles is flat. All of the articles are lumped togeth= er under the heading 'tutorials' when that label doesn't necess= arily fit many of them. I would much rather see a 'Knowledge Base' = area, with articles organized by hierarchies with many-to-many mappings of = levels to articles.

I completely agree. Don&= #39;t feel restricted by the current structure of the content. It too can a= nd should evolve.


--001a1134a7665f969704f6276521--