the output from the 1.2.0 version is there for reference, this is what I have come to expect.
On 27.03.2015 19:09, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
On 27 Mar 2015, at 18:00, Mr. Herr <misterherr@freenet.de> wrote:
I'm not sure if I've missed something obvious, since you haven't specified what you think has gone wrong. You appear to have typed in "opam update" twice.
the 1.2.1 binary from https://github.com/ocaml/opam/releases/tag/1.2.1, as well as the compile result of
opam-full-1.2.1.tar.gz are behaving strange on my opensuse 1.3.1.
All I did was to replace the 1.2.0 binaries with the 1.2.1 version.
Here a console log where 'opam' is /usr/local/bin/opam-1.2.1-x86_64-Linux
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol/strobel-sources> opam update
=-=- Updating package repositories =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=
[default] synchronized from https://opam.ocaml.org
Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
===== ↻ 1 ↗ 1 =====
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol> opam-1.2.0-x86_64-Linux update
[default] Downloading https://opam.ocaml.org/urls.txt
Updating /opt/opam/repo/compiler-index ...
Updating /opt/opam/compilers/ ...
Updating /opt/opam/repo/package-index ...
Updating /opt/opam/packages/ ...
Updates available for 4.02.1, apply them with 'opam upgrade':
=== 1 to reinstall | 1 to upgrade ===
strobel@s131-intel:/data/lvmvol>
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
What can I do to debug this?
Either do "opam update -u" (which updates the package sets and upgrades them), or "opam update && opam upgrade".
The 1.2.1 binary is not doing the same checks, and outputs hieroglyphs - very dubious.
/Str
--
Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs