From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id pB6FIiFc006439 for ; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:18:44 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AsgAAJUx3k7RVdc2kGdsb2JhbABEqlQIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgXIBAQEBAwwGAiwBEicDDAEFBQs7IhIBBQEcBjWgBAqOT4UuiS4CBQqLKASUZo1sPYFLgi0 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,306,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="134185127" Received: from mail-lpp01m010-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 06 Dec 2011 16:18:39 +0100 Received: by lagv3 with SMTP id v3so1659570lag.27 for ; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:18:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=rFBPJF1vhMmgKN0baWjfIBYhwlaB8Mnscr7986AsydE=; b=cMLnQt+AxuqcWasaE76vVgTC5mrIAyZT82lsySGAxt+ZjJXBTH5TnF+HnwEdwbibPv DcP+XAhAsxPyBwd1wejBBNWM8AEXogABRKyuLZztz0ktolJF6hEGKi5ejNxwYg63Y/CT 0GeVSk3YlqljGQC47gpFGFAZsOuhuMvx1+TKg= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.68.32.7 with SMTP id e7mr24396945pbi.48.1323184717723; Tue, 06 Dec 2011 07:18:37 -0800 (PST) Sender: damien.pous@gmail.com Received: by 10.142.76.5 with HTTP; Tue, 6 Dec 2011 07:18:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <874nxersj1.fsf@frosties.localnet> References: <874nxersj1.fsf@frosties.localnet> Date: Tue, 6 Dec 2011 16:18:37 +0100 X-Google-Sender-Auth: 2veg2S6RymlL6-vRZCjE9ueHwcQ Message-ID: From: Damien Pous To: caml-list Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id pB6FIiFc006439 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] hashing big ints Thanks Jérémie, Goswin, and Boris. I downloaded zarith and I'll switch to it, it looks really nice. Just in case, I resume part of Boris' private answer: the generic hash function is fixed for Big_int values in the trunk (bug 5290), it should be ok from OCaml 3.13. Damien