What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer than tsdl to me. Or slim_sdl.

-Yotam Barnoy


On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Anthony Tavener <
> anthony.tavener@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about
>> module-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other"?
>>
>
> You never know if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say
> yes, you should be concerned.
>
>
> Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would you
>> really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a
>> library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn't
>> possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names!
>>
>
> Good point. So, I guess I'm saying try hard for a short intuitive name
> first, but yes, sometimes it's not possible.
>
>