From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F17467EC6E for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 19:02:31 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of yotambarnoy@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.216.46; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yotambarnoy@gmail.com"; x-sender="yotambarnoy@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of yotambarnoy@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.46 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.216.46; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yotambarnoy@gmail.com"; x-sender="yotambarnoy@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-qa0-f46.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.216.46; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="yotambarnoy@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-qa0-f46.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AhgDAFnisVLRVdgulGdsb2JhbABZhBe4c4ETCBYOAQEBAQcLCwkSKoIlAQEBBEABGx0BAwELBgUEBw0uIQEBEQEFARwGE4dvAQMRpR6MWoMJjW0KGScNZIYYEQEFDIxzghMHhDYEiUOMaIFrjFqDTRgphHUe X-IPAS-Result: AhgDAFnisVLRVdgulGdsb2JhbABZhBe4c4ETCBYOAQEBAQcLCwkSKoIlAQEBBEABGx0BAwELBgUEBw0uIQEBEQEFARwGE4dvAQMRpR6MWoMJjW0KGScNZIYYEQEFDIxzghMHhDYEiUOMaIFrjFqDTRgphHUe X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.95,508,1384297200"; d="scan'208";a="41617284" Received: from mail-qa0-f46.google.com ([209.85.216.46]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 18 Dec 2013 19:02:31 +0100 Received: by mail-qa0-f46.google.com with SMTP id f11so3957421qae.5 for ; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:02:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=lxOHB4BVx1E4bfwnJ5JacmDQde4aLNGz2oaC/XSO2Ps=; b=UuQ/DWGa+ADX4l/43sPdU7Xr91zZEHVLvjsNlFbu552y5etUxH3diQ0SDUIWvjJnUr cw4TPr5vp8fP4+zGe97Dw4Q0Vba0+o20ykUnMeA+4s42x5/WbNj2eWb2yv9v2m51LzPZ tzhYlDGXa9Nued80n8jcpHyiSmqENuRw6bPbe7w7+tneWkzAUFbcS96zMsIwcMso3J6g eHudPnxRczfuD5WfpfZ2PLFnrSgw+FtGSfobfwPdkg0D1O+NYx7BR0eA8sfiN93/asqF iga9iq792uq+qbxSsuWQv0iXn/PmQzSiJMLuxy4l1ri3UAEH6ia3b/KBXm1dfa6Y+HZ+ FSJg== X-Received: by 10.224.121.140 with SMTP id h12mr4960917qar.41.1387389749944; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:02:29 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.224.95.8 with HTTP; Wed, 18 Dec 2013 10:02:09 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <4DDEBB7487B641C0834F09D522EA9918@erratique.ch> <1C9496037B6149EC970D65C3BFA490F7@erratique.ch> From: Yotam Barnoy Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2013 13:02:09 -0500 Message-ID: To: Ashish Agarwal Cc: Anthony Tavener , =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= , caml list Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0153700a36026e04edd2d99e Subject: Re: [Caml-list] SDL2 bindings, testers and feedback welcome --089e0153700a36026e04edd2d99e Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer than tsdl to me. Or slim_sdl. -Yotam Barnoy On Wed, Dec 18, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ashish Agarwal wrote: > On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 PM, Anthony Tavener < > anthony.tavener@gmail.com> wrote: > > This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about >> module-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other"? >> > > You never know if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say > yes, you should be concerned. > > > Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would you >> really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a >> library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn't >> possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names! >> > > Good point. So, I guess I'm saying try hard for a short intuitive name > first, but yes, sometimes it's not possible. > > --089e0153700a36026e04edd2d99e Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
What's wrong with thin_sdl? Sounds much nicer tha= n tsdl to me. Or slim_sdl.

-Yotam Barnoy
=


On Wed, Dec 1= 8, 2013 at 10:40 AM, Ashish Agarwal <agarwal1975@gmail.com> wrote:
=
On Tue, Dec 17, 2013 at 2:45 P= M, Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gmail.com> wrote= :

This does raise a question though... should we be concerned about modu= le-name clashes for libraries which should be used "one or the other&q= uot;?

You nev= er know if someone wants to link in both libraries, so I would say yes, you= should be concerned.


Sdl, Glut, Qt, Gtk, Xml... it's only cryptic at first, and what would y= ou really use which is less cryptic? I can understand the desire to have a = library name which at least gives a hint of it's utility, but this isn&= #39;t possible in the general case without getting some cumbersome names!

Good point. So, I guess I'= m saying try hard for a short intuitive name first, but yes, sometimes it&#= 39;s not possible.


--089e0153700a36026e04edd2d99e--