Re: [Caml-list] print_int is too slow

[Anthony Tavener <anthony.tavener@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1021 bytes --]

Yeah, this seems surprising. In C I'd often have fflush(stdout); In OCaml I
make use of the %! printf feature. Normally I want output to be buffered,
for efficiency, but I know points where I want to ensure a "sync" so that
I'm not looking at incomplete output. Mind you, I mostly use stdout/stderr
for logging/printf traces...

On Sun, Jun 24, 2012 at 5:06 PM, Lukasz Stafiniak <lukstafi@gmail.com>wrote:

> On Mon, Jun 25, 2012 at 12:19 AM, Diego Olivier Fernandez Pons
> <dofp.ocaml@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > During all the years I have been coding, I had never had to worry
> > about flushing I/O (when / why / how) in any language (C/C++, Java, C#
> > and OCaml).
> > I actually had even forgotten those things existed...
>
> You haven't needed to flush output when debugging?
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa-roc.inria.fr/wws/info/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 1703 bytes --]