From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8D5157EEEB for ; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 21:43:33 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of bobzhang1988@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of bobzhang1988@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AjgCAOdevlDRVd+2m2dsb2JhbABEvicIFg4BAQEBAQgJFBQngkwZARseAxIQXQERAQUBIogQAQMPnxeCbIwzgXCBCoUgChknDVmIdQEFDJBsA4hfjSSOZxYphDE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,217,1355094000"; d="scan'208";a="164771092" Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 04 Dec 2012 21:43:32 +0100 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id s9so10633210iec.27 for ; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:43:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=aLZeeT0W0d/B5ACSh8dGm8wDbY2mrUW+oWqNjplM0yY=; b=vgevV/vtWiCim1S3vO7qAT09JpqOA33WhqCgFzILED3OzVVpHmTMCdH9UR/TTp+ze9 H36KKQ3TZU+RZiI7R48PAge57vK2+RIHASVXy+WBRSC3hy8R6QvvA9WzcX/MPi5W0Elo DkPRVzAV8XGRwKZYDtHU8elcY002OueQ/gMOU7nm0HOeaE/NNx/svHb/3xzyWIogt1BP WMDfsi+D8tN/k5iGll+AMXuKsfNYVmiSo0Um8MgGbpcYb1cPY+1uqkFx/NrA3OBbTaSo masV8kb8cPIs4ppnGWluhY9oDqC99twsYlay0U9dY0hBe9xnKM13Ex2cCEqxEOtp31/H wpGw== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.43.130.131 with SMTP id hm3mr12293432icc.25.1354653811595; Tue, 04 Dec 2012 12:43:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.64.17.4 with HTTP; Tue, 4 Dec 2012 12:43:31 -0800 (PST) Date: Tue, 4 Dec 2012 15:43:31 -0500 Message-ID: From: bob zhang To: Caml List Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: [Caml-list] Absolute path in the module system Dear List, Is there a way to express the absolute module path? For example, Pervasives.(+) --> actually I want it to be absolute Pervasives module, not shadowed by any 'open' statements? Is there a way to do that? if not, is there any deep reason for not doing this? Thanks -- Regards -- Bob