From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EF63F7EDD8 for ; Fri, 5 Oct 2012 01:15:57 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of bobzhang1988@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of bobzhang1988@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.182 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.223.182; receiver=mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="bobzhang1988@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-ie0-f182.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: ArUBAFUYblDRVd+2m2dsb2JhbABFgku8SQgjAQEBAQEICQsJFCeCFyICLAEbHgMSCAEHXQERAQUBIjWHUAEDD5Z7gmEJA4wlgnWFAQoZJw1ZiHUBBQyROwOVaY5NFimEKQ X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.80,537,1344204000"; d="scan'208";a="157950509" Received: from mail-ie0-f182.google.com ([209.85.223.182]) by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 05 Oct 2012 01:15:40 +0200 Received: by mail-ie0-f182.google.com with SMTP id k10so3865987iea.27 for ; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=Di8WyivOYIBhXlRjKFjVR1LZ0IvDejDeodavR5i0Yzc=; b=qcDlKqCQz+CNTKSajQETy2yAga1lXyIyVYEJVt04Q8YvV+9r07m+gWePXyXDfZ1dKJ KUup0k7+5zUANSuQxzZ7FMW6bViZwRLtilMI9vAHr/rpx5A5idVEpmngBDridIrxcJsh 253/JTtNE+JB+IPgJ8tAJLmFPMKkAAZ2VLFninbTYeIgK31mniUbensND8fS+NEpBsfB SwGTU15BqZ+M64jx3RJEttorp3SYurDsp1iE6hGPxhhTwpcIJw/NzslvvS2hngiUOjQ8 lSevJ1F2I9expechaFesd8GML6jGh3nQxKf8kFPjkUQkvv4Sp9JEPTj7MnbER5kvxs4U 2nvg== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.50.41.132 with SMTP id f4mr6914155igl.39.1349392539002; Thu, 04 Oct 2012 16:15:39 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.64.17.4 with HTTP; Thu, 4 Oct 2012 16:15:38 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2012 19:15:38 -0400 Message-ID: From: bob zhang To: Caml List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=14dae9340f65f325e004cb43eec8 Subject: [Caml-list] Polymorphic Variants for big Ast? --14dae9340f65f325e004cb43eec8 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Dear List, Has anyone have the experience using polymorphic variant for a big Ast? The benefit I can think of is open recursion, global namespace(not in a module). Did anyone give a try? Many thanks -- Regards -- Bob --14dae9340f65f325e004cb43eec8 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dear List, =A0 =A0Has anyone have the experience using polymorphic variant for a big A= st?=A0
=A0 The b= enefit I can think of is =A0open recursion, global namespace(not in a modul= e). Did anyone give a try?
Many thanks

--
Regards
-- Bob<= br> --14dae9340f65f325e004cb43eec8--