From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3E9B07FE07 for ; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 11:37:35 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:wGnuvhejm7Q79VI3f+zQCf+jlGMj4u6mDksu8pMizoh2WeGdxc6yZh7h7PlgxGXEQZ/co6odzbGG7Oa5BCdZud6oizMrTt9lb1c9k8IYnggtUoauKHbQC7rUVRE8B9lIT1R//nu2YgB/Ecf6YEDO8DXptWZBUiv2OQc9HOnpAIma153xjLDtvcSOKFwQzBOGIppMbzyO5T3LsccXhYYwYo0Q8TDu5kVyRuJN2GlzLkiSlRuvru25/Zpk7jgC86l5r50IAu3GePFySrdRCTBjOGcv6eXksh7MSQaA/HwBSn5QmR1NSUCR6xrzW5O0uSzgu8Jy3y6VOcD5V7cpQS/k5KBuHkzGkiACYhw06mzSi8E4oKNeoRSm70h9z4/RYYeSHPh3eK7GYckXSHYHVcFUAX8SSrigZpcCWrJSdd1TqJPw8gMD Authentication-Results: mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jdimino@janestreet.com; spf=Pass smtp.mailfrom=jdimino@janestreet.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of jdimino@janestreet.com) identity=pra; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of jdimino@janestreet.com designates 38.105.200.112 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com) identity=helo; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BcAAAx17FWnHDIaSZehAwsQQaIVbE/AQ2BZBcBCYVsAoE1BzgUAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGFglEC4ItghQBAQEDARIRHQEBNwEECwsEBw0qAgIiEgEFARwGEyKHcQgDC6JogTE+MYpNZ4RAAQSKSgEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPAgQKhgiEN4Rfghs4E4EnjSqJTIVJgm0FhRKBW40WRIUshH6CFhEegQ0eAQGCOB4cgTRqiWsBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0BcAAAx17FWnHDIaSZehAwsQQaIVbE/AQ2BZBcBCYVsAoE1BzgUAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGFglEC4ItghQBAQEDARIRHQEBNwEECwsEBw0qAgIiEgEFARwGEyKHcQgDC6JogTE+MYpNZ4RAAQSKSgEBAQEBAQEDAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEPAgQKhgiEN4Rfghs4E4EnjSqJTIVJgm0FhRKBW40WRIUshH6CFhEegQ0eAQGCOB4cgTRqiWsBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,389,1449529200"; d="scan'208,217";a="162764437" Received: from mxout1.mail.janestreet.com ([38.105.200.112]) by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 03 Feb 2016 11:37:34 +0100 Received: from tot-qpr-mailcore2.delacy.com ([172.27.56.106] helo=tot-qpr-mailcore2) by mxout1.mail.janestreet.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aQuoW-0000an-2R for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 05:37:32 -0500 X-JS-Flow: external Received: by tot-qpr-mailcore2 with JS-mailcore (0.1) (envelope-from ) id BWsdhs-AAACko-Aq; 2016-02-03 05:37:32.022144-05:00 Received: from mail-io0-f180.google.com ([209.85.223.180]) by mxgoog1.mail.janestreet.com with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aQuoV-0003Bl-Tn for caml-list@inria.fr; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 05:37:31 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f180.google.com with SMTP id 9so50605995iom.1 for ; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 02:37:31 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=4/SuxAByKPAk5iaHQWdduvKPE2zCyWsc7UqB++f2jpg=; b=x+FpsNGcZ31ZSUrQEZto/tvh1Ks3q88qRSiBS2LZ1Dk5tosG43G/zGW0hOz1LLQ2hs DT8znPu1ERcQjYMZ6wmG3Z9ziTvTHYEsiH4GybyzxMJcVQm6lmt2eSjYhbvickriOT30 PLO6Tk6eW1a68VSKk2XAwWll3N/4Doh2uACCU= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=4/SuxAByKPAk5iaHQWdduvKPE2zCyWsc7UqB++f2jpg=; b=gX2HOvT0+ian1KBePtprIypdWRloEcw4LqfspMjQrmvVxWsuxr8rMEQHaoNVvEyPFx TEaTYsYldBCb9F6sv59vQZGq+9qHgScQKgyZQhgz3iQnGZNoDRb+5jF8VV9nENkmivtm oeveM/swZEkjhWKTcsoVcVjBentpGqZMTcVe0e5P2PSNPYBoOq0JRjMKlubNZ6R3bicX WJ6QLMx9CHfK+2pkiE0dx1DOck1SDEmqPYaYh7oXAveskvflj18fcbOS93eXEmyHAudm ryEXwPhAEMwY9j83EU61bT5jQ1jCMyrUEoF5ZsT8oQJgdC6+OKQqX8m/MqONWBsuhPTp H3qQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOS0BayQK/zUfiCRLjFf8aLVksbhFNi/meX8FywPYU93MbDFpTU0giaCLxIj8phYIwCgIYK2UnT35uWB419dGZ6FWHCv2BkWafRm3MUF1XO9Vcm/4yPHXoqM+wUjZq2Rm/0jSWteqoyx9l3Biu5ksg== X-Received: by 10.107.155.18 with SMTP id d18mr2566171ioe.135.1454495851581; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 02:37:31 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.155.18 with SMTP id d18mr2566162ioe.135.1454495851443; Wed, 03 Feb 2016 02:37:31 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.30.193 with HTTP; Wed, 3 Feb 2016 02:37:31 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Wed, 3 Feb 2016 10:37:31 +0000 Message-ID: From:Jeremie Dimino To:"ocaml-core@googlegroups.com" Cc:"caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a11418e5c8d9c5c052adb349c X-JS-Processed-by: mailcore Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Package renamings for sexplib, bin_prot and a few other camlp4 syntax extensions --001a11418e5c8d9c5c052adb349c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Just to follow up, the addition of `.syntax` packages was released this week: https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/5523 On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jeremie Dimino wrote: > On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ivan Gotovchits wrote: > >> > 3. release project.0.3.1, keeping project.0.3 unchanged >> >> The problem is that `project.0.3` will be broken for ever, as well as all >> dependencies that depend on this particular version. >> >> Maybe there is actually some misunderstanding, and we're talking about >> different things. Just to clarify, are you going to go >> through opam-repository and update all archives of old libraries (e.g. >> sexplib.7.0.5, sexplib.108.00, ...) and remove `.syntax` >> findlib library from it? This is what I'm afraid of. And this is what I >> name "retroactively". >> As according to the PR there is nothing like this. If all old archives >> will be still available, then it is perfectly fine. >> > > =E2=80=8BIndeed, I misunderstood your original =E2=80=8Bquestion. Sorry a= bout that. > We definitely won't touch the archive of any released package. I agree > that would be disastrous... > > -- > Jeremie > --=20 Jeremie --001a11418e5c8d9c5c052adb349c Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Just to follow up, the addition of `.syntax` packages w= as released this week:=C2=A0https://github.com/ocaml/opam-repository/pull/5523

On Tue, Ja= n 26, 2016 at 5:17 PM, Jeremie Dimino <jdimino@janestreet.com>= wrote:
On Tue, Jan 26, 201= 6 at 4:56 PM, Ivan Gotovchits <iv= g@ieee.org> wrot= e:
> 3. release project.0.3.1, keeping project.0.3 unchanged

<= /div>
The problem is that `project.0.3` will be broken for ever,= as well as all dependencies that depend on this particular version.=C2=A0<= /div>

Maybe there is actually some misunderstanding, and= we're talking about different things. Just to clarify, are you going t= o go=C2=A0
through opam-repository and update all archives of old= libraries (e.g. sexplib.7.0.5, sexplib.108.00, ...) and remove `<librar= y>.syntax`=C2=A0
findlib library from it? This is what I'm= afraid of. And this is what I name "retroactively".
As= according to the PR there is nothing like this. If all old archives will b= e still available, then it is perfectly fine.
=
=E2=80=8BIndeed, I misunderstood your original =E2= =80=8Bquestion. Sorry about that.
We definitely won't touch t= he archive of any released package. I agree that would be disastrous...

--
J= eremie



--
Jeremie
--001a11418e5c8d9c5c052adb349c--