From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6756B7F198 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 18:17:17 +0100 (CET) IronPort-PHdr: 9a23:kwiZJB3+Y38O2BTismDT+DRfVm0co7zxezQtwd8ZsegeKPad9pjvdHbS+e9qxAeQG96LtLQc06GJ7ejJYi8p39WoiDg6aptCVhsI2409vjcLJ4q7M3D9N+PgdCcgHc5PBxdP9nC/NlVJSo6lPwWB6kO74TNaIBjjLw09fr2zQd6NyZzvnL/ss7ToICx2xxOFKYtoKxu3qQiD/uI3uqBFbpgL9x3Sv3FTcP5Xz247bXianhL7+9vitMU7q3cY6Lod8JsKVq7zeqB9RrtCARwpNGc64MDkrx7eVRDJ7XwZGC1ClRFBBgyA5xbgU7/+tSz1sudywi6HJdawRrcxD2eM9aBuHT3lkioCNjNx3GDSi8p3xPZZrBOkphp464zdZoyOKOBzc7+bdtQfEzkSFv1NXjBMV9vvJ7AECPAMaL5V Authentication-Results: mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; spf=None smtp.pra=jdimino@janestreet.com; spf=PermError smtp.mailfrom=jdimino@janestreet.com; spf=None smtp.helo=postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of jdimino@janestreet.com) identity=pra; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: PermError (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: cannot correctly interpret sender authenticity information from domain of jdimino@janestreet.com) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com) identity=helo; client-ip=38.105.200.112; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="jdimino@janestreet.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mxout1.mail.janestreet.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0BKAQDjqadWnHDIaSZehDhBBohRsiyBYoYPAoFFBzoSAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGFglEC4ItghUBAQMBEhEdAQE3AQQLCwQHNwICIhIBBQEcBhMih3EIA6IBgTE+MYpNZ4RAAQSKYgEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBARIGCoYohG2HTIE6jTKJTIg4BYUZgV6NG0SFLoR+ghYRH4ENJwiCJx4igTVqiEQBAQE X-IPAS-Result: A0BKAQDjqadWnHDIaSZehDhBBohRsiyBYoYPAoFFBzoSAQEBAQEBAQEQAQEBAQEGFglEC4ItghUBAQMBEhEdAQE3AQQLCwQHNwICIhIBBQEcBhMih3EIA6IBgTE+MYpNZ4RAAQSKYgEBAQEBAQQBAQEBAQEBARIGCoYohG2HTIE6jTKJTIg4BYUZgV6NG0SFLoR+ghYRH4ENJwiCJx4igTVqiEQBAQE X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.22,350,1449529200"; d="scan'208,217";a="199494909" Received: from mxout1.mail.janestreet.com ([38.105.200.112]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 26 Jan 2016 18:17:12 +0100 Received: from tot-qpr-mailcore1.delacy.com ([172.27.56.68] helo=tot-qpr-mailcore1) by mxout1.mail.janestreet.com with esmtps (TLSv1:DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA:256) (Exim 4.82) (envelope-from ) id 1aO7Et-00055i-7U for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:17:11 -0500 X-JS-Flow: external Received: by tot-qpr-mailcore1 with JS-mailcore (0.1) (envelope-from ) id BWp6oX-AAAClk-F5; 2016-01-26 12:17:11.189825-05:00 Received: from mail-io0-f176.google.com ([209.85.223.176]) by mxgoog1.mail.janestreet.com with esmtps (UNKNOWN:AES128-GCM-SHA256:128) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1aO7Et-0007qH-3S for caml-list@inria.fr; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 12:17:11 -0500 Received: by mail-io0-f176.google.com with SMTP id g73so196913456ioe.3 for ; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:17:11 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=janestreet.com; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=feFG4CRcm3t1Wc+9fuQYTwR73uvKCWoGES4YmkOdA2I=; b=OPqvWFRXjpeTJ6UgovGrilBzlHxG+RoqgbOur4Bbt5F4C54wRzEb7YGqPDHMFVBhsM LdRxb/biFD23/YhffU6HUrq0pH/7LDvVq13yiQeL208QuLsIk0lZmymyJQBBW/IWFGop f9QIlTla8W0jaujfrPVhIte40MZRCGqmyrSkA= X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20130820; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:cc:content-type; bh=feFG4CRcm3t1Wc+9fuQYTwR73uvKCWoGES4YmkOdA2I=; b=E+ojsuMwc4xA6U7Z/66tysx7Wtj6HmmOKON+FBZZO15pJLY7wnTVZ9j/Cku/LBTq7F KMynkaND2byrB1agaHg/wwnqSiq+BYeaApG9lUT46gTp9NVmukwvDYr3jq47u7lVuNKO cQ2pjFll+6uR7KN3wsEowNUWYGzkh/7K1scK7x1Os5A1uOUqtI4gACkOKqfC4Kx2KQCY M9linHmNcea+Qu8Pyp/0JWInlouv5f6UP5vqIzBcFyGusFMdRoe2fh0m9a0Ub3gydTfR zom8+vrGp7Jr5WqX07DhJsMckhiFOGPlK1VC4rwpZma+KnCcHcd0qW2l29gKdGGSYIfP +1YQ== X-Gm-Message-State: AG10YOSZgINaJw8g0JPsL+aEaRjYvmhZmr2A38KZqjcGguj0BZ9KS6ZyyWzOXm7JUqzG9PfNiTPsJ7Wpgep9acnIoeoqLjy3lKw0WXxMiv/5bkkJ5iFowB7xyoAV/+qmqTt8Z6biunEpJFO+lOLnKoEBkw== X-Received: by 10.107.138.164 with SMTP id c36mr27762070ioj.82.1453828630794; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:17:10 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.107.138.164 with SMTP id c36mr27762040ioj.82.1453828630518; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:17:10 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.50.30.193 with HTTP; Tue, 26 Jan 2016 09:17:10 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Tue, 26 Jan 2016 17:17:10 +0000 Message-ID: From:Jeremie Dimino To:"ocaml-core@googlegroups.com" Cc:"caml-list@inria.fr" Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=001a113fe9381645e1052a3fdb10 X-JS-Processed-by: mailcore Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Package renamings for sexplib, bin_prot and a few other camlp4 syntax extensions --001a113fe9381645e1052a3fdb10 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ivan Gotovchits wrote: > > 3. release project.0.3.1, keeping project.0.3 unchanged > > The problem is that `project.0.3` will be broken for ever, as well as all > dependencies that depend on this particular version. > > Maybe there is actually some misunderstanding, and we're talking about > different things. Just to clarify, are you going to go > through opam-repository and update all archives of old libraries (e.g. > sexplib.7.0.5, sexplib.108.00, ...) and remove `.syntax` > findlib library from it? This is what I'm afraid of. And this is what I > name "retroactively". > As according to the PR there is nothing like this. If all old archives > will be still available, then it is perfectly fine. > =E2=80=8BIndeed, I misunderstood your original =E2=80=8Bquestion. Sorry abo= ut that. We definitely won't touch the archive of any released package. I agree that would be disastrous... --=20 Jeremie --001a113fe9381645e1052a3fdb10 Content-Type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Ja= n 26, 2016 at 4:56 PM, Ivan Gotovchits <ivg@ieee.org> wrote:
>= ; 3. release project.0.3.1, keeping project.0.3 unchanged

The problem is that `project.0.3` will be broken for ever, as = well as all dependencies that depend on this particular version.=C2=A0

Maybe there is actually some misunderstanding, and we&= #39;re talking about different things. Just to clarify, are you going to go= =C2=A0
through opam-repository and update all archives of old lib= raries (e.g. sexplib.7.0.5, sexplib.108.00, ...) and remove `<library>= ;.syntax`=C2=A0
findlib library from it? This is what I'm afr= aid of. And this is what I name "retroactively".
As acc= ording to the PR there is nothing like this. If all old archives will be st= ill available, then it is perfectly fine.

=
=E2=80=8BIndeed, I misunderstood your original =E2=80=8Bquest= ion. Sorry about that.
We definitely won't touch the archive of= any released package. I agree that would be disastrous...
=
--
Jeremie
--001a113fe9381645e1052a3fdb10--