From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <philippe.veber@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 688987F30A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri,  8 Mar 2013 23:21:37 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  philippe.veber@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=74.125.82.169;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="philippe.veber@gmail.com";
  x-sender="philippe.veber@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  philippe.veber@gmail.com designates 74.125.82.169 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=74.125.82.169;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="philippe.veber@gmail.com";
  x-sender="philippe.veber@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-we0-f169.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=74.125.82.169;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="philippe.veber@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-we0-f169.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4BAAFjOlFKfVKpgmdsb2JhbABDxE+BVQgWDgEBFBQSBiSCIwkBAQQBQAEbHQEDDAYFAwEHOyIBEQEFARwGiBMBAwkGnWqMMoJ7hDsKGScNWYh8AQUMjwAHg0ADllOPEBYphC4
X-IPAS-Result: At4BAAFjOlFKfVKpgmdsb2JhbABDxE+BVQgWDgEBFBQSBiSCIwkBAQQBQAEbHQEDDAYFAwEHOyIBEQEFARwGiBMBAwkGnWqMMoJ7hDsKGScNWYh8AQUMjwAHg0ADllOPEBYphC4
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,810,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="4726122"
Received: from mail-we0-f169.google.com ([74.125.82.169])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Mar 2013 23:21:36 +0100
Received: by mail-we0-f169.google.com with SMTP id t11so1628956wey.0
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:21:36 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=x-received:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id
         :subject:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=DXqHgDfgKu26JzDLI86PwjZjv+1DJpygMRa+Vtj6eSY=;
        b=XJMNt9xCMv244wpL17naG24X0YkPOEkIIF5hmVDL97paIiTFVyQd2HZZI5CyI2BpQs
         iUtO4dGRIKZGw6S1ES4w3FiOz9SuBlzXZnDwvuZnjpeVshljiPEHU1uw+c2jUlidgNFJ
         Toy8O/KEe85TDCrrM/znv4DALytOEQoa7PO7gFfZixwDtLKV46jZU0Zu008gsRireqx0
         vlLqHlvv2yULPjLweJZBgh7SdxpuD2jKsq0IeQkryjF2xhy0ZMBfvtzmLQ0usfRPoQtE
         TL93b96VilBtar9Ld5bZW4/aDOJc9lrvWX+0fU78zBfTENIuWHOTUWGaQp9+uv+F9/Ts
         p8fw==
X-Received: by 10.194.237.40 with SMTP id uz8mr6824530wjc.49.1362781296588;
 Fri, 08 Mar 2013 14:21:36 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.194.87.230 with HTTP; Fri, 8 Mar 2013 14:21:16 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <A62BF17F101C4BBCB4D28BDC61F720A9@erratique.ch>
References: <CAOOOohTw2dG0MYwuDSvyX0Cxh9Xd_3ekNEaCZhgiztxOOFfd8Q@mail.gmail.com>
 <B3006DF47FCC4C54A55FD4B571F49F5C@erratique.ch> <A62BF17F101C4BBCB4D28BDC61F720A9@erratique.ch>
From: Philippe Veber <philippe.veber@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Mar 2013 23:21:16 +0100
Message-ID: <CAOOOohRQ5iRgL-tNrVBStx2=cj0Bs=P0ekh=9y=kMD=HuRuCUQ@mail.gmail.com>
To: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=089e0149372016ff2804d7713fe3
X-Validation-by: philippe.veber@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Signals of signals in react


--089e0149372016ff2804d7713fe3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

>
> P.S. You should replace your use of ( == ) in S.map by S.equal otherwise
> you'll get potentially incorrect results (too many updates) with imperative
> dependent signals if your map function also returns constant signals ---
> unless you think that two constant signals with the same value should not
> be thought as equal.
>

Thanks, I had overlooked the existence of S.equal.

--089e0149372016ff2804d7713fe3
Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

<br><div class=3D"gmail_quote"><blockquote class=3D"gmail_quote" style=3D"m=
argin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex"><span class=
=3D"HOEnZb"><font color=3D"#888888">
</font></span><br>
P.S. You should replace your use of ( =3D=3D ) in S.map by S.equal otherwis=
e you&#39;ll get potentially incorrect results (too many updates) with impe=
rative dependent signals if your map function also returns constant signals=
 --- unless you think that two constant signals with the same value should =
not be thought as equal.<br>

</blockquote><div><br>Thanks, I had overlooked the existence of S.equal. <b=
r><br></div></div>

--089e0149372016ff2804d7713fe3--