caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Philippe Veber <philippe.veber@gmail.com>
To: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Parameterizing a function with a thread monad
Date: Wed, 24 Oct 2012 12:45:37 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOOOohSRz_U5u-bwAiyp6w+XFtdU7_ZuLYKYgLKy8uu3RLaBkw@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAPFanBFCOaOtczaCiKskfVVmUhr8vz7Y3GBPSpLjBFydOn01nw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1959 bytes --]

Hi Gabriel,

well thanks, I had forgotten this interesting approach by Daniel. Indeed
for now I'd like to try a functor/first-class module -based solution.
Thanks for the suggestion anyway!
Cheers,
  ph.

2012/10/23 Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>

> If you want to parametrize over arbitrary monads, the modularized
> appraoch (using functors or first-class modules) is adapted. But note
> that for more specialized needs different interfaces are possible. For
> example, Daniel Bünzli experimented with explicit inversion of control
> instead of parametrization by monadic library, to solve the problem of
> being Lwt/Async/"event loop" agnostic:
>
>   [Caml-list] Non-blocking IO interface design
>   https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list/2012-04/msg00055.html
>
> I'm not sure how this worked out in the end, but this may be worth
> looking at if you're still at the general design step.
>
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2012 at 1:52 AM, Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com> wrote:
> > On 22 October 2012 23:09, Philippe Veber <philippe.veber@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >> A couple of libraries, like pgocaml for instance, define a functor over
> a
> >> (monadic) thread implementation, like in the following:
> >>
> >> module type Thread = sig
> >>   type 'a t
> >>   val return : 'a -> 'a t
> >>   val bind : 'a t -> ('a -> 'b t) -> 'b t
> >> end
> >>
> >> module F(T : Thread) : sig
> >>   val v : string -> string T.t
> >> end
> >>
> >> Is it possible to define F as a function (ie at the value level)?
> >
> > Yes!  Matías Giovannini has a blog post showing how to do just that:
> >
> > http://alaska-kamtchatka.blogspot.co.uk/2011/09/higher-order-fun.html
> >
> > --
> > Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 3079 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2012-10-24 10:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2012-10-22 22:09 Philippe Veber
2012-10-22 23:52 ` Jeremy Yallop
2012-10-23  7:56   ` Gabriel Scherer
2012-10-24 10:45     ` Philippe Veber [this message]
2012-10-24 10:30   ` Philippe Veber

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOOOohSRz_U5u-bwAiyp6w+XFtdU7_ZuLYKYgLKy8uu3RLaBkw@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=philippe.veber@gmail.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=gabriel.scherer@gmail.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).