From: Philippe Veber <philippe.veber@gmail.com>
To: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: [Caml-list] Uncaught exceptions in function type.
Date: Mon, 26 May 2014 16:23:09 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOOOohTKWk6gsz2MFqMniK0MLenRmdvsh8hG1hjqO2cXQJxj0Q@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 538 bytes --]
Hi everyone,
Out of curiosity, I was wondering how difficult it would be in theory to
extend the type system so that exceptions that can pop out of a function
when it is called would be included in the type of the function. Could this
type information be infered automatically? Could this be used to have an
exhaustivity check in the "with" part of a try ... with expression?
I guess that if it was so easy, we would already be enjoying it within our
favorite compiler, but I fail to see how hairy is the question.
Cheers,
Philippe.
[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 609 bytes --]
next reply other threads:[~2014-05-26 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-05-26 14:23 Philippe Veber [this message]
2014-05-26 14:56 ` Romain Bardou
2014-05-26 15:13 ` Ben Millwood
2014-05-26 16:02 ` Philippe Veber
2014-05-26 16:34 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-05-27 6:52 ` Philippe Veber
2014-05-27 8:42 ` Ben Millwood
2014-05-27 10:05 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-27 10:36 ` Ben Millwood
2014-05-27 11:24 ` Yaron Minsky
2014-05-27 21:42 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-05-27 21:16 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-06-02 8:38 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-27 8:49 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-27 8:56 ` David House
2014-05-27 21:39 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-06-02 8:31 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-27 9:25 ` Nicolas Boulay
2014-05-27 21:51 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-05-30 18:03 ` Florian Weimer
2014-05-31 11:26 ` Daniel Bünzli
2014-06-02 8:43 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-26 15:25 ` Philippe Veber
2014-05-27 9:28 ` Goswin von Brederlow
2014-05-27 9:38 ` Romain Bardou
2014-05-26 15:33 ` Thomas Blanc
2014-05-26 16:04 ` Philippe Veber
2014-05-26 15:33 ` Gabriel Scherer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=CAOOOohTKWk6gsz2MFqMniK0MLenRmdvsh8hG1hjqO2cXQJxj0Q@mail.gmail.com \
--to=philippe.veber@gmail.com \
--cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).