Re: [Caml-list] a question about Ocaml semantics

[Philippe Veber <philippe.veber@gmail.com>]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1413 bytes --]

Hi Matej,

I'm no expert, but I'm pretty sure the problem here is related to the value
restriction [0]. If you change the last line to:

# let _ = f { enter = fun x -> (+) 1 x } ;;
- : int = 3

there is no typing error anymore. Note that with ocaml 4.04.0 and 4.04.1,
your original definition is accepted.

hope this helps,
  Philippe.

[0] https://caml.inria.fr/pub/papers/garrigue-value_restriction-fiwflp04.pdf



2017-05-26 10:08 GMT+02:00 Matej Kosik <
5764c029b688c1c0d24a2e97cd764f@gmail.com>:

> Hi,
>
> There's an Ocaml language feature I do not understand.
>
> E.g. in this example:
>
>   type 'a phantom = int
>   type t = { enter : 'a. 'a phantom -> int }
>   let f g = g.enter 2
>   let _ = f { enter = fun x -> 1 + x } (* ok *)
>   let _ = f { enter = (+) 1 }          (* fails to typecheck *)
>
> I don't get why, if we have:
>
>   type 'a phantom = int
>
> i.e. "'a phantom" is defined as an alias of "int",
> how is it possible that the following types:
>
>   { enter : 'a. 'a phantom -> int }
>
> is not equal to
>
>   { enter : 'a. int -> int }
>
> I've tried to find a corresponding section in the Reference Manual, but I
> failed.
> Where is this explained?
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2517 bytes --]