caml-list - the Caml user's mailing list
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Christoph Höger" <christoph.hoeger@celeraone.com>
To: "Nicolás Ojeda Bär" <nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com>
Cc: OCaml Mailing List <caml-list@inria.fr>
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] How is the frametable handled when throwing exceptions?
Date: Sun, 12 Feb 2017 14:25:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <CAOazmvsLA8-A8c_wHG_vE1BzEqMmPLDnWr5F4XRrqA-aa1zgpA@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADK7aFM8Zn1jnqFDowhzPRG_yQRjwOo3QbVjerXR40Go9rROMw@mail.gmail.com>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1946 bytes --]

Nicolás,

that is my understanding, too. But what I am missing is the
_de_-registration of the roots. AFAIK, the frametable is a static, global
object and when the stack is cut down, it then contains stale pointers. So
either the frametable is useless (as a global object), because the GC
traverses the call stack or there is some kind of deregstration going on
somewhere.

On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:10 PM, Nicolás Ojeda Bär <
nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com> wrote:

> Hi Christoph,
>
> Someone who knows more will be able to get a better answer, but I don't
> think there is much of an issue here:
> when using the C API to register local roots (CAMLparam, CAMLlocal, etc),
> these roots are in effect
> stored in the C stack.  When raising an exception the stack is _cut down_
> and all those roots
> are promptly forgotten (as they should be).
>
> Cheers,
> Nicolas
>
>
> On Sat, Feb 11, 2017 at 3:02 PM, Christoph Höger <
> christoph.hoeger@celeraone.com> wrote:
>
>> Dear all,
>>
>> while studying camls native code generation and garbage collection
>> strategy, I came upon Connor Benner's bachelor thesis from 2012, where he
>> implemented a llvm backend for ocamlopt. One intriguing remark mentioned
>> OCamls exception mechanism as basically consisting a pointer to the stack
>> frame of the last exception handler in a special register (r14, when I
>> recall correctly). Throwing an exception that becomes a mov/pop/ret
>> operation. This however, seems to interfere with garbage collection: From
>> the C-API, it seems that all local roots are stored in the frametable via
>> some special macros (e.g. CAMLParam, CAMLlocal).
>>
>> When control just returns from a stack frame, how are the entries removed
>> from the frametable?
>>
>> I would be glad, if someone could answer this or point me to the relevant
>> documentation (if any exists).
>>
>> thanks,
>>
>> Christoph
>>
>
>

[-- Attachment #2: Type: text/html, Size: 2715 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2017-02-12 13:25 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-02-11 14:02 Christoph Höger
2017-02-11 14:10 ` Nicolás Ojeda Bär
2017-02-12 13:25   ` Christoph Höger [this message]
2017-02-12 14:55     ` Nicolás Ojeda Bär
2017-02-13 15:13 ` Stephen Dolan

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=CAOazmvsLA8-A8c_wHG_vE1BzEqMmPLDnWr5F4XRrqA-aa1zgpA@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=christoph.hoeger@celeraone.com \
    --cc=caml-list@inria.fr \
    --cc=nicolas.ojeda.bar@lexifi.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).