From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail4-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.105])
	by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q28LeF9d004795
	for <caml-list@sympa-roc.inria.fr>; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:40:15 +0100
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AuEBACUmWU/RVde2kGdsb2JhbABDhTWvbAgiAQEBAQkJDQcUBCOCCgEBAQQSAg8dARsdAQMMBgULDQICJgICIgERAQUBHAYTCBqHaJx9CosoTIJxhR4/iHQBBQuBJI4RgRYEjXOHUo46PYQF
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.73,553,1325458800"; 
   d="scan'208";a="135108603"
Received: from mail-ey0-f182.google.com ([209.85.215.182])
  by mail4-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Mar 2012 22:40:10 +0100
Received: by eaaf13 with SMTP id f13so340176eaa.27
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :cc:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=9VGxQnXiSptTmC10d3CrI5EoMc6qZvNoZ+Cn3D2dyYM=;
        b=kwT2+Hq4bd1/n7mrwApIwisoE6IO4osPF+X84phdWcJ6oTALKk71DUkghaQNRj8UEE
         WSB7UosuTerurQ6Z7IbFNsFtzRssVnZ0OdtB/vS88L9z2s6UzZ5vDDDh5GgFzTgrJdko
         W954ehTlH/C8A+VeRutei/rI/jypldXSo6JDFPvigWWherV/HzMmpbX0ZSg1aBHhGehd
         +S4RvJxSiFqKJmreTGUDmcJ9MLhwFzQ/IccvLgGoc0Dg9Ql0gfgmJJlfvjDiSpf2dE45
         dBaaJZAi8pW7bmSnb6ipyyu6lx0gPMQj85I5zt+kxR/xxglsJXNF50/xZI6WEJDcHJOE
         XcNQ==
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.14.131.145 with SMTP id m17mr2673517eei.115.1331242810006;
 Thu, 08 Mar 2012 13:40:10 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.213.31.134 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Mar 2012 13:40:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CAOCAUGMSw26s2m4-a9t98Mx+c43wyNcOjtHauj-OC8Mh6-w+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <1991A512A37E49ACA5AAD30A38D628BF@erratique.ch>
	<slrnjlgric.7tu.sylvain@gallu.homelinux.org>
	<E201E8FA661141D89910CC9F1EE84160@erratique.ch>
	<CAOCAUGMSw26s2m4-a9t98Mx+c43wyNcOjtHauj-OC8Mh6-w+Mg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Mar 2012 22:40:09 +0100
Message-ID: <CAP5QFJkrdzRKx8t7rWoXTQhYO1dV1hKX_6ZsEVDTcTUBT97Fxw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Adrien <camaradetux@gmail.com>
To: Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net>
Cc: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Daniel_B=FCnzli?= <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>,
        caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-MIME-Autoconverted: from quoted-printable to 8bit by walapai.inria.fr id q28LeF9d004795
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Re: oasis packaging questions

Hi,

On 08/03/2012, Sylvain Le Gall <sylvain@le-gall.net> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> 2012/3/8 Daniel Bünzli <daniel.buenzli@erratique.ch>:
>> Le jeudi, 8 mars 2012 ŕ 09:31, Sylvain Le Gall a écrit :
>>> setup.ml will be enough for me ;-) But I am biased.
>>
>> For distribution, I'm fine with that aswell. For developement setup.ml
>> takes too much time to invoke (adds an overhead of 0.5s on my system).
>>
>
> That the parsing time because the file is big. I know this issue and
> will try to improve that in the future. I think a 50% down size is
> possible, that will bring this time to 250ms. Although, I don't think
> that even for development env a 500ms delay is that big... I doubt to
> be able to reduce to ~0s.

For my own stuff, I've been using a Makefile which includes a rule to
(re)compile setup.ml into an executable with ocamlc.opt (compiling
with ocamlopt was too slow). My usual development machine isn't
terribly fast and this has helped a lot.

I think there was a mention of an issue though but it can help a lot.

Regards,
Adrien Nader