From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by walapai.inria.fr (8.13.6/8.13.6) with ESMTP id q0VB8MjS012960 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:08:22 +0100 X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AigBAB3LJ09KfVM2kGdsb2JhbABDrlcIIgEBAQEJCQ0HFAQhgXIBAQEEEgIsARsdAQMMBgULDS4iAREBBQEcBhMiozgKi2uCcIUJP4hxAgULinwCAQICCQICAQYHBAYBCA0OCgwCCQMBhBoLg1gEjVuHQ44WPYQA X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.71,595,1320620400"; d="scan'208";a="142187834" Received: from mail-ee0-f54.google.com ([74.125.83.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 31 Jan 2012 12:08:16 +0100 Received: by eekb47 with SMTP id b47so2086808eek.27 for ; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:08:16 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=rBWd8bAH8zZ5+mAD10q9xnFFnAIjm337aaa4mQ9NejM=; b=Bn5Qnv/P5xXB//S5hB+sv7LwOFhZIrz/ikHXMVnZsHELewKlr3KNpHMhFGSFsarcxp gHVztFjM4e0g3l2n5se9sVwrHZh8iB/pZaZQ8djMVLX+WoODsiqcRVrC8n84uC39UUiK zEyw/tc6tOsoWCUl1I10RlITgoYHzBAraUa1c= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.14.97.134 with SMTP id t6mr345346eef.117.1328008096520; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:08:16 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.213.4.68 with HTTP; Tue, 31 Jan 2012 03:08:16 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <20120131100224.GA4413@siouxsie> References: <471204069.596560.1327958835658.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr> <1898845183.596573.1327958954685.JavaMail.root@zmbs2.inria.fr> <20120131100224.GA4413@siouxsie> Date: Tue, 31 Jan 2012 12:08:16 +0100 Message-ID: From: Adrien To: oliver Cc: Pierre Vittet , caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ANN] Vim plugin On 31/01/2012, oliver wrote: > Sometimes I had problems with syntax highlighting in OCaml. > The end of comments was not always displayed correctly colored. > This was the case, when long and nested comments were used. > Then the non-comment section sometimes was displayed as > if it were a comment. > > Someone also knows that problem? > > Maybe that is another issue that you might be able and interested > to fix...?! Hello, I've had the issue with long comments too but I think it's not specific to the ocaml highlighting: if you move around (forcing some kind of refresh when doing so), you will probably recover the proper highlighting (gg'' might be enough). Regards, Adrien Nader