Agreed. Some people still use 4.02.0; we should hunt them, understand their use-case (I heard it could be something so simple to fix that "this PR I use the automatic opam switch for was submitted for 4.02.0"), and move them to 4.02.1.

Please speak up if you're concerned! There is no good reason to suffer the atrocious compilation times.

On Mon, Feb 16, 2015 at 4:59 PM, François Bobot <francois.bobot@cea.fr> wrote:
On 16/02/2015 12:04, Anil Madhavapeddy wrote:
We are currently testing the following compiler versions on every pull request to OPAM;

- OCaml 3.12.1
- OCaml 4.00.1
- OCaml 4.01.0
- OCaml 4.02.0


 Running 6 compiler revisions per package puts quite a bit of stress on our Travis CI
resources, and so it's probably time to retire OCaml 3.12.1 from the testing matrix.


More than 3.12.1, I think 4.02.0 should retire when 4.02.1 enter.

OCaml 4.02.1 added a lot of important fixes, I think nobody should use 4.02.0 instead of 4.02.1.

Best,

--
François Bobot


--
Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs