I guess I'm not modern enough to feel comfortable using alloca (or
variable-length arrays) in my code :-)

On Sat, Dec 3, 2016 at 2:36 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rich@annexia.org> wrote:

> On Sat, Dec 03, 2016 at 03:00:57PM +0100, immanuel litzroth wrote:
> > Yes, I've used that solution too, keeping a static fixed string around,
> > it's just not very nice and will break if it's ever multithreaded.
>
> You shouldn't make the string static, and we do *not* do that in
> libguestfs.  You should simply allocate it on the stack.  This is
> thread safe.
>
> Also on the bug it was stated:
>
> > The stack-based solutions rely on guessing arbitrary size limits on
> > the dynamic strings, which is often possibles but sometimes
> > inconvenient/inelegant.
>
> but this is not true either.  You can use alloca to allocate a
> variable sized string on the stack.
>
> As Xavier Leroy says, fixing this is not necessary, although there's
> perhaps a usability argument.
>
> Rich.
>
> --
> Caml-list mailing list.  Subscription management and archives:
> https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
> Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
> Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs
>