From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr (mail3-relais-sop.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.104])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CBA7C7F8A0
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Tue,  8 Apr 2014 15:36:12 +0200 (CEST)
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  gabriel.scherer@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.214.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: domain of
  gabriel.scherer@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.181 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=209.85.214.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ob0-f181.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.214.181;
  receiver=mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ob0-f181.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlwCAOf5Q1PRVda1lGdsb2JhbABZg0FXxCeBFggWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJQEBAQRAARsdAQMMBgULDS4hAQERAQUBHAYTCIdfAQMRDZwHjF+DDpcBChknDWSGBxEBBQyMR4IZB4Q4AQOWb4FugTSLPYNgGCmDH4FBOw
X-IPAS-Result: AlwCAOf5Q1PRVda1lGdsb2JhbABZg0FXxCeBFggWDgEBAQEHCwsJEiqCJQEBAQRAARsdAQMMBgULDS4hAQERAQUBHAYTCIdfAQMRDZwHjF+DDpcBChknDWSGBxEBBQyMR4IZB4Q4AQOWb4FugTSLPYNgGCmDH4FBOw
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.97,818,1389740400"; 
   d="scan'208";a="56150700"
Received: from mail-ob0-f181.google.com ([209.85.214.181])
  by mail3-smtp-sop.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 08 Apr 2014 15:36:11 +0200
Received: by mail-ob0-f181.google.com with SMTP id wp4so1007790obc.12
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Tue, 08 Apr 2014 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=N7ur/TcXqqrLKPTqe7sIo6SsY9+wrQ+SBwQFaPsYVB0=;
        b=Bcx7J9RJrM+99wIbFaNFYnD1jAjYO0R+mMSn/qu5sqKWQERcfxXvKhkzmg+rbsEBY7
         JYfOr7GF6J7NlhAvvqvfNxuhy6lWDwAUxOk66YFTGXaOpa/SCHKIbUZ2t7xTwQA1v0Nb
         pbGWcwzGxMAEZmgO+QAtnErQf+MPBgtzW9L0HOLNXcozd0ypmg5e0l3yLAu0GbiiAobF
         Ts4o/0yuBNT0TgfCFSOrYcEdXYCdh1lpXqgiyfQyPhPDVCNSwUF5JxLBwJhQL257F5YI
         FWy+z+DONELaBWB9mNdosaIckp/QfRYr5W6eVMwTCsne+2csygEjVJVLP/SR0bOSVK+K
         KzEg==
X-Received: by 10.182.158.135 with SMTP id wu7mr3308424obb.28.1396964170770;
 Tue, 08 Apr 2014 06:36:10 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.76.18.209 with HTTP; Tue, 8 Apr 2014 06:35:30 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <CAAxsn=GFAbSeJqu0qW4YYM08Diq=sEgC+7ziuBLOR5RDQxMWOw@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CAPFanBH4fYEmgoXkNLwAfta1cRVSPjmA-gB1GdzjeTWRATGeCQ@mail.gmail.com>
 <CAAxsn=GFAbSeJqu0qW4YYM08Diq=sEgC+7ziuBLOR5RDQxMWOw@mail.gmail.com>
From: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 8 Apr 2014 15:35:30 +0200
Message-ID: <CAPFanBHMzpxB_VD9oOPpWcOQYymkcQUrnX3nniXzB4TyA6YPbA@mail.gmail.com>
To: Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com>
Cc: caml users <caml-list@inria.fr>, 
	"platform@lists.ocaml.org" <platform@lists.ocaml.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] [ocaml-platform] [ANN] Experiment: OCaml patch
 review on github.com/ocaml/ocaml

Sure, let's consider this repository is also part of the PR experiment.

Jacques-Pascal: that's a good remark, but to be fair the names comes
from the original SVN repository for the ocaml manual, itself named
"ocamldoc". I agree "ocaml-manual" would be a better name.


On Tue, Apr 8, 2014 at 2:37 PM, Jeremy Yallop <yallop@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 30 January 2014 11:34, Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> TL;DR: During the six next months, we will follow pull requests (PR)
>> posted on the github mirror of the OCaml distribution, as an
>> alternative to the mantis bugtracker.
>
> We now also have a GitHub mirror of the OCaml manual:
>
>     https://github.com/ocaml/ocamldoc/
>
> Could we please extend the experiment to include pull requests to the
> manual as well as to the main source tree?  There have been a few pull
> requests recently that will need corresponding updates to the
> documentation.  It'd be useful to give source and documentation
> changes the same visibility.