From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C9F1B7EE1A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:16:04 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  gabriel.scherer@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.210.180;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  gabriel.scherer@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.180 as
  permitted sender) identity=mailfrom;
  client-ip=209.85.210.180;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-ia0-f180.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.210.180;
  receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-ia0-f180.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AtEBAMO+uFDRVdK0m2dsb2JhbABEwAUIFg4BAQEBAQgJFBQngh4BAQVAARsdAQMMBgULDS4iAREBBQEcBhOHfQEDD6ETjDOCeoUEChknDVmIdQEFDIw0hEEDlgCOZBYphBQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,191,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="183990070"
Received: from mail-ia0-f180.google.com ([209.85.210.180])
  by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 30 Nov 2012 15:16:04 +0100
Received: by mail-ia0-f180.google.com with SMTP id t4so548836iag.39
        for <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:16:03 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to
         :cc:content-type;
        bh=NsgpVfyfX9IXdNPAn5c0uDNTZCVdy60ZE/DXHLndr1k=;
        b=dgMlZSDiqyERsCyrMEjI2ZK2U+0U6T2O5GnDS35Mh7a2hxpcAgBaCH0HkZ3BGGRADp
         wg4jLBUdNZj/EzdkSkCAj8Ih3Qp2M8ljEHldbFlZDmX0Lx4t7Ihv1AwfX3kLQ1icnIi2
         WKr6Uhwaevqqi0TDrWXxc3c7N0eqHOFwSNtRXNNRwBcLgUJLiy9M5eeYAhf2tEH590vS
         b0aTfMcdEjWlGbEkQuELZ3DB+OYKekz81/Jk1iAhDQonRPABTdVUQpydMZXVZM2ZOo/T
         t2azH0MV+UqhkjB+69/P+55+Zl2cNxLplTjleWMz0en56isf7FotdbsS5DOnUAsV3KMh
         Ca5w==
Received: by 10.50.13.133 with SMTP id h5mr1161488igc.2.1354284962968; Fri, 30
 Nov 2012 06:16:02 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.50.184.199 with HTTP; Fri, 30 Nov 2012 06:15:22 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <50B8B527.3020800@univ-savoie.fr>
References: <87625rhu04.fsf@golf.niidar.ru> <CA+LkvyrPzuOo5dMnOHDzn1zWg6Lya9k6Ym6Wz6qJQQLYq6q6ZA@mail.gmail.com>
 <50B8AB75.5030508@univ-savoie.fr> <CAPFanBEDbM58BqSy=Rwrn6K3ET2yxf5LnARzfuAsUtTyYyTjGw@mail.gmail.com>
 <50B8B527.3020800@univ-savoie.fr>
From: Gabriel Scherer <gabriel.scherer@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Nov 2012 15:15:22 +0100
Message-ID: <CAPFanBHp0zSD1bL5U-+Cz3cuMgpRczEAbZJQa0UbCU0M7vPb5A@mail.gmail.com>
To: Christophe Raffalli <christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr>
Cc: Caml List <caml-list@yquem.inria.fr>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] ocamlc, ocamlopt stackoverflow on list

It works with small lists, blows up with a Stack Overflow on a
really-unbalanced parsetree, I would really assume it is a
tail-recursion issue. I checked that the failure happens after parsing
time (-dparsetree produces an output); camlp4 must also have a
(different) non-tail-rec code path somewhere.

The easiest way to find out where this particular instance
of the problem lies would be to build a version of the compiler
with debug information and invoke
  OCAMLRUNPARAM="b ocamlc ...

On Fri, Nov 30, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Christophe Raffalli
<christophe.raffalli@univ-savoie.fr> wrote:
>
> I Think with list of size 30000 it might not be only a problem of tailrec (it seems
> to fail to parse in fact with a difference error message with ocamlc and ocamlc -pp camlp4o).