From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B835B7EE4B for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:03:56 +0200 (CEST) Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of gabriel.scherer@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.214.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com"; x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of gabriel.scherer@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.50 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.214.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com"; x-sender="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-bk0-f50.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.214.50; receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="gabriel.scherer@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-bk0-f50.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AlwDAEidRVLRVdYylWdsb2JhbABagz9SrXeKEohCgRQIFg4BAQEBBw0JCRIqgiUBAQQBQAEbEgsBAwELBgUEBxohIgERAQUBChIGExKHYQEDCQYMnBKMUoMKhAoKGScDCmSJAAEFDI9BBAeEIAOXf4Evjl8YKYRPOg X-IPAS-Result: AlwDAEidRVLRVdYylWdsb2JhbABagz9SrXeKEohCgRQIFg4BAQEBBw0JCRIqgiUBAQQBQAEbEgsBAwELBgUEBxohIgERAQUBChIGExKHYQEDCQYMnBKMUoMKhAoKGScDCmSJAAEFDI9BBAeEIAOXf4Evjl8YKYRPOg X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.90,993,1371074400"; d="scan'208";a="34644310" Received: from mail-bk0-f50.google.com ([209.85.214.50]) by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 27 Sep 2013 17:03:55 +0200 Received: by mail-bk0-f50.google.com with SMTP id mz11so1045556bkb.9 for ; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:03:55 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc:content-type; bh=tBXnlIH1Hb+MAhBa1wE5CbtzovB+tfnUKOCPYjhmwkM=; b=hwtiKjKVMncO5dRBvsZutMNeluIR5cAKVnt3wJR1aEY8w+OnvTOj25zAAUTKUobbfW J4X1YIoA0mJxLjwbp71oqLyt/SL1u0VvSBnfrVHd2YSIjgRCT5ttIV/Qb8jnHD3r0+ah InaDTZhcsdJMpvHQBCzJd9N6wDg836ov7oC/cWpk/wc9e7ZP29q2LBTyLxSQUIZIrFun rU7WNKsVEgEmGbszlX2WU16NOKXj5B3s0co+LZCRyZtKSNuQ/s4dz7zyrtCzlqdIoIzI 7MQAJ5ITELCseMLVoHwof8qMkTItb9Kuk4UCkCuXtk7qiZOnDqtMhcYWkvANur5WjYiY uvKA== X-Received: by 10.205.15.72 with SMTP id pt8mr6315879bkb.17.1380294235504; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:03:55 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.236.193 with HTTP; Fri, 27 Sep 2013 08:03:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: From: Gabriel Scherer Date: Fri, 27 Sep 2013 17:03:15 +0200 Message-ID: To: Alan Schmitt Cc: Fabrice Le Fessant , Ocaml Mailing List Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=20cf301cbd5c97f3f904e75ecb2c Subject: Re: [Caml-list] =?ISO-8859-1?Q?meetup_OCaml-Pairs_=28OUPS=29=2C_m?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?ercredi_9_octobre_=E0_l=27IRILL?= --20cf301cbd5c97f3f904e75ecb2c Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 My understanding is that this OUPS meeting is precisely intended to coincide with an "official annoucement" of the system, so I would recommend waiting for a couple more weeks before looking at the system (surely they have polishing planned before that) and discussing it. I would tend to agree with your implicit remark about unclear project status (internal/external, announced/secret, released/experimental) in the general case; but I understand that everyone is free to handle their project as they deem acceptable. I'm personally fine with waiting a bit -- and this is still better than ocp-build or ocaml-java. On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alan Schmitt < alan.schmitt@polytechnique.org> wrote: > Hello, > > Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr writes: > > > * Jane Street : "Jenga: towards a correct and scalable build system" > > I've been searching my mail archives and I could not find an official > announcement of Jenga (it was alluded to in the announcement of Core > Suite 109.11, then mentioned in further announcements and in the > ocamlbuild thread of late July). I had a look at the examples in the > github repository, and it looks like a very verbose way of writing > dependencies (see for instance > https://github.com/janestreet/jenga/blob/master/examples/hello/JengaRoot.ml > ). > > I'm sure I'm missing the motivation behind this new build system. How > does it compare to the existing ones? > > Thanks, > > Alan > > -- > Caml-list mailing list. Subscription management and archives: > https://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list > Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners > Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs > --20cf301cbd5c97f3f904e75ecb2c Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
My understanding is that this OUPS meeting is precisely in= tended to coincide with an "official annoucement" of the system, = so I would recommend waiting for a couple more weeks before looking at the = system (surely they have polishing planned before that) and discussing it.<= br>
I would tend to agree with your implicit remark about unclear project s= tatus (internal/external, announced/secret, released/experimental) in the g= eneral case; but I understand that everyone is free to handle their project= as they deem acceptable. I'm personally fine with waiting a bit -- and= this is still better than ocp-build or ocaml-java.


On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 2:40 PM, Alan Schmitt <alan.schmi= tt@polytechnique.org> wrote:
Hello,

Fabrice.Le_fessant@inria.fr<= /a> writes:

> * Jane Street : "Jenga: towards a correct and scalable build syst= em"

I've been searching my mail archives and I could not find an offi= cial
announcement of Jenga (it was alluded to in the announcement of Core
Suite 109.11, then mentioned in further announcements and in the
ocamlbuild thread of late July). I had a look at the examples in the
github repository, and it looks like a very verbose way of writing
dependencies (see for instance
https://github.com/janestreet/jenga/blob/mas= ter/examples/hello/JengaRoot.ml).

I'm sure I'm missing the motivation behind this new build system. H= ow
does it compare to the existing ones?

Thanks,

Alan

--
Caml-list mailing list. =A0Subscription management and archives:
ht= tps://sympa.inria.fr/sympa/arc/caml-list
Beginner's list: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/ocaml_beginners
Bug reports: http://caml.inria.fr/bin/caml-bugs

--20cf301cbd5c97f3f904e75ecb2c--