From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Return-Path: <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr
Received: from mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail2-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.83])
	by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EDD127F30A
	for <caml-list@sympa.inria.fr>; Sun, 10 Mar 2013 04:04:45 +0100 (CET)
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  markus.mottl@gmail.com) identity=pra;
  client-ip=209.85.212.174;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
Received-SPF: Pass (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of
  markus.mottl@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.174 as permitted
  sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.212.174;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1"
Received-SPF: None (mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender
  authenticity information available from domain of
  postmaster@mail-wi0-f174.google.com) identity=helo;
  client-ip=209.85.212.174;
  receiver=mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr;
  envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com";
  x-sender="postmaster@mail-wi0-f174.google.com";
  x-conformance=sidf_compatible
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: AkUCAAH3O1HRVdSuiGdsb2JhbABDxEyBVggWDgEBAQoJFBQEJIIsAQEFQAEUBx0BAwwGBQsNLiEBAREBBQEcGYgAAQMPnlOMMoJ7g3MKGScNWYh8AQUMjDqCSAcWgyoDiHKMA4Fgi1yDNxYphEse
X-IPAS-Result: AkUCAAH3O1HRVdSuiGdsb2JhbABDxEyBVggWDgEBAQoJFBQEJIIsAQEFQAEUBx0BAwwGBQsNLiEBAREBBQEcGYgAAQMPnlOMMoJ7g3MKGScNWYh8AQUMjDqCSAcWgyoDiHKMA4Fgi1yDNxYphEse
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.84,816,1355094000"; 
   d="scan'208";a="6268088"
Received: from mail-wi0-f174.google.com ([209.85.212.174])
  by mail2-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 10 Mar 2013 04:04:45 +0100
Received: by mail-wi0-f174.google.com with SMTP id hi8so347083wib.13
        for <caml-list@inria.fr>; Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:04:45 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=20120113;
        h=mime-version:x-received:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id
         :subject:from:to:cc:content-type;
        bh=qd51NnxkfTU1i54bEiO7h3dPUra04PZoeCOJS1mXZSQ=;
        b=BPxg2EfP+Ji/wakIaoY/8MQO30fj09Kq0bZyluU1uZAj2PUT/xk6B/zVuocwGgmAxm
         /RXZd3e2qwoMOsLhm7Df0v3MkMmxgEGqwukjx6U2y+3di61HR/VENzIcacac7yfo+0zO
         Vo3mZWYdqPn11EpeHO3dbYNXO/Kp3C1qL78cBFoASMIKDFQ18QVGU08Nb/cbRUcUY/aF
         my2Ydhm3/khcjjQ8gMuBWgG+q2Uqghqt5Vp8S9GPz+34xsUnfQSUvVFaFS0nLuwFAk5W
         E6KyEcqQsWamx7j+H7hbiUcmmOzPfIPXXrmN4zhvn0hVeC1vVZwVd/KXKwnE7Naufeuj
         yOYA==
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Received: by 10.180.14.233 with SMTP id s9mr5708194wic.25.1362884685206;
 Sat, 09 Mar 2013 19:04:45 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.194.18.135 with HTTP; Sat, 9 Mar 2013 19:04:45 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <CADKNfhKDC-EwsKkjZ+uqbary5Cy48k=+J_GX4dzAMCi5v0hsNg@mail.gmail.com>
References: <CADKNfhKDC-EwsKkjZ+uqbary5Cy48k=+J_GX4dzAMCi5v0hsNg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 9 Mar 2013 22:04:45 -0500
Message-ID: <CAP_800puNGk0UjA787iYwmKaF-=bFcTnwhdPOiu_U=BeJ6v3wg@mail.gmail.com>
From: Markus Mottl <markus.mottl@gmail.com>
To: yminsky@gmail.com
Cc: caml-list@inria.fr
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Record field disambiguation in 4.01

On Sat, Mar 9, 2013 at 6:39 PM, Yaron Minsky <yminsky@gmail.com> wrote:
> A few concerns: one, it's really hard to figure out where the source
> of the conflict is from this message.  It would be nice to get some
> clue from the compiler as to the two definitions that are conflicting.

I haven't investigated this, but my bet would be that the ambiguity is
due to the record in the Core.Std.Date module (y = year).

Regards,
Markus

-- 
Markus Mottl        http://www.ocaml.info        markus.mottl@gmail.com