From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Original-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Delivered-To: caml-list@sympa.inria.fr Received: from mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr (mail1-relais-roc.national.inria.fr [192.134.164.82]) by sympa.inria.fr (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B2E447EE20 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 19:49:04 +0100 (CET) Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of markus.mottl@gmail.com) identity=pra; client-ip=209.85.215.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com"; x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible Received-SPF: Pass (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: domain of markus.mottl@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.54 as permitted sender) identity=mailfrom; client-ip=209.85.215.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com"; x-sender="markus.mottl@gmail.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible; x-record-type="v=spf1" Received-SPF: None (mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr: no sender authenticity information available from domain of postmaster@mail-la0-f54.google.com) identity=helo; client-ip=209.85.215.54; receiver=mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr; envelope-from="markus.mottl@gmail.com"; x-sender="postmaster@mail-la0-f54.google.com"; x-conformance=sidf_compatible X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: At4CAFbno1DRVdc2k2dsb2JhbABEhVa9WggjAQEBAQkJCwkUBCOCHgEBBUABFAcdAQMMBgULDS4hAQERAQUBHAYTCIdvAQMPnG2MM4J4hHwKGScNWYh1AQUMizhpBYYnA4hai02BVYsygzAWKYQv X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.83,252,1352070000"; d="scan'208";a="181527594" Received: from mail-la0-f54.google.com ([209.85.215.54]) by mail1-smtp-roc.national.inria.fr with ESMTP/TLS/RC4-SHA; 14 Nov 2012 19:48:38 +0100 Received: by mail-la0-f54.google.com with SMTP id j13so1051360lah.27 for ; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :cc:content-type; bh=FqFiGdRacZVb1KkE/BQ1gn29eVuPZM7WsY7Jm/HV98w=; b=rs8kAQsMcbyikTW85uHI/7En9IPgcGLuHur5EpAOqTpNPpQTYRuEmusGxjNnLniSLe uXMudtf7jxMzpF7dVAxJKH3URQCJv2jV/3L1FRNowRPsHpu6Fmbxr8j7V+rsO1RLbPqd OP+HRdId794cQcwtfvItZXM8DA8eUYFYOdu1iIYSEl4/ZG6OcsYdzB7RxoziJ6ttqkdz LQw/5ocZwEIvkGm9rhFkjnhNgsSg+28rtm2S7K6pO1ABs7W5S6Q2Bm+I3OFTjrvoevuT UPJYdFYPciMWvqZNGqRsO3UeuyjEL02XR9YvUqNEHUQJPX4jrpiV0UOtafn3fq26v5jT UGPQ== MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.152.110.42 with SMTP id hx10mr25942654lab.0.1352918917479; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.152.125.106 with HTTP; Wed, 14 Nov 2012 10:48:37 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <50A3E041.6080906@ens-lyon.org> References: <20121114124355.7e8ca762@xivilization.net> <50A3ADC1.5090402@gmail.com> <20121114180012.68bf06df@xivilization.net> <50A3E041.6080906@ens-lyon.org> Date: Wed, 14 Nov 2012 13:48:37 -0500 Message-ID: From: Markus Mottl To: Martin Jambon Cc: Marek Kubica , caml-list@inria.fr Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Subject: Re: [Caml-list] Preferred layout for new packages On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Martin Jambon wrote: > Use for in-house development: > - omake > - batteries (some of it) > > Avoid in new projects: > - camlp4/camlp5 > - ocamlbuild I wish ocamlbuild were a serious alternative to omake. Though I use the former for distributing libraries, I also prefer omake for more complex projects. Concerning camlp4: what alternative are you considering? Though camlp4 has its good share of warts, it also offers useful functionality that I don't see anywhere else yet. Regards, Markus -- Markus Mottl http://www.ocaml.info markus.mottl@gmail.com